The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1838 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pauline McNeill
It is concerning that the minister said in her statement that the Government has not yet established
“a clear agreement on the minimum vacant secure care capacity requirements for Scotland ... at any given time”.
Given that there has been a change in the law, which many have welcomed, I ask the minister to be clear on what will happen to a young offender who previously would have been in Polmont if, on the day of sentencing, they are required to go to a secure place but none is available. Can I have the minister’s cast-iron assurance that that young offender will remain in Scotland? What will happen in that situation?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Pauline McNeill
Scotland has had its own sexual abuse scandals involving children. One well-reported case, operation planet, was an investigation into the alleged abuse of young boys recruited for sex work, many of whom were in care. That case is not included in the inquiry.
I acknowledge the presence of the First Minister, John Swinney, who has been personally dedicated, over many years, to addressing the issue of historical child sex abuse.
I wrote to Lady Smith last year to ask for the inclusion of such abuse cases involving children in care that are currently not included. I hope to have the minister’s support for that. I also ask the minister to confirm that the continuing commitment to invest in the survivors of child abuse will give practical support to those adults who have survived child sex abuse.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
On Sunday 15 December, which was the day of the Scottish cup final, we witnessed appalling scenes of violence and disorder in the city centre of Glasgow, which was caused by groups of football supporters—who were not representative, of course, of the vast majority of football fans.
First, I agree with the First Minister when, in response to that, he said that clubs have a role to play in preventing such disgraceful behaviour. We agree on that. However, given that the police are now trying to identify those who are responsible through the use of closed-circuit television and social media footage, is the First Minister aware that CCTV cameras in Glasgow are no longer staffed 24 hours, seven days a week? That means that, before the 3 pm shift, the cameras cannot zoom in and there cannot be detailed monitoring of disorder in real time.
I fully appreciate that the First Minister will say that he is not responsible for CCTV in Glasgow, but I am asking him not to stay silent about this. Does he believe that Police Scotland needs all available resources to tackle crime, not just those relating to football events but other crimes, such as violence against women, that often occur outwith those hours? Does the First Minister agree—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I appreciate that he might not be aware of this, but does he agree that it is a scandal that Police Scotland was not consulted when Glasgow City Council removed 24/7 CCTV? I would like the First Minister to agree with me on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
That is because such information would not normally be available, because the convictions are spent—I understand. I am trying to understand the purpose of the order so that I understand what it does. The SSI will make that information available slightly earlier and give more information in relation to the application for the relevant orders.
In your view, is it more likely that such orders would be granted if we legislate for the change? What is the purpose of the SSI? Why is the information needed earlier? Does having that information give the police, who obviously think that it is required, a better chance to get the application granted?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. That makes sense. There is a gap. I just wanted to be clear before we come to a conclusion. We always have to be careful about spent convictions—if they are included, it must be for a reason. I just wanted to be sure that what we are doing is proportionate, and I am satisfied about that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right. I see.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
You said “unspent convictions”. Does the order also include spent convictions for lower-tariff applications?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
So, the SSI will make the process smoother. I ask for completeness: will the change to the process include information that was not previously given in relation to lower-tariff offences?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
That is the confusing bit. You are saying that the issue is one of process—I understand that—but you specifically said that the new process will include lower-tariff offences, whereas it used to apply to higher-tariff offences only. That looks like a substantial change.