Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1838 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Secure Accommodation Capacity

Meeting date: 8 January 2025

Pauline McNeill

It is concerning that the minister said in her statement that the Government has not yet established

“a clear agreement on the minimum vacant secure care capacity requirements for Scotland ... at any given time”.

Given that there has been a change in the law, which many have welcomed, I ask the minister to be clear on what will happen to a young offender who previously would have been in Polmont if, on the day of sentencing, they are required to go to a secure place but none is available. Can I have the minister’s cast-iron assurance that that young offender will remain in Scotland? What will happen in that situation?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Pauline McNeill

Scotland has had its own sexual abuse scandals involving children. One well-reported case, operation planet, was an investigation into the alleged abuse of young boys recruited for sex work, many of whom were in care. That case is not included in the inquiry.

I acknowledge the presence of the First Minister, John Swinney, who has been personally dedicated, over many years, to addressing the issue of historical child sex abuse.

I wrote to Lady Smith last year to ask for the inclusion of such abuse cases involving children in care that are currently not included. I hope to have the minister’s support for that. I also ask the minister to confirm that the continuing commitment to invest in the survivors of child abuse will give practical support to those adults who have survived child sex abuse.

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

On Sunday 15 December, which was the day of the Scottish cup final, we witnessed appalling scenes of violence and disorder in the city centre of Glasgow, which was caused by groups of football supporters—who were not representative, of course, of the vast majority of football fans.

First, I agree with the First Minister when, in response to that, he said that clubs have a role to play in preventing such disgraceful behaviour. We agree on that. However, given that the police are now trying to identify those who are responsible through the use of closed-circuit television and social media footage, is the First Minister aware that CCTV cameras in Glasgow are no longer staffed 24 hours, seven days a week? That means that, before the 3 pm shift, the cameras cannot zoom in and there cannot be detailed monitoring of disorder in real time.

I fully appreciate that the First Minister will say that he is not responsible for CCTV in Glasgow, but I am asking him not to stay silent about this. Does he believe that Police Scotland needs all available resources to tackle crime, not just those relating to football events but other crimes, such as violence against women, that often occur outwith those hours? Does the First Minister agree—

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

I appreciate that he might not be aware of this, but does he agree that it is a scandal that Police Scotland was not consulted when Glasgow City Council removed 24/7 CCTV? I would like the First Minister to agree with me on that.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

That is because such information would not normally be available, because the convictions are spent—I understand. I am trying to understand the purpose of the order so that I understand what it does. The SSI will make that information available slightly earlier and give more information in relation to the application for the relevant orders.

In your view, is it more likely that such orders would be granted if we legislate for the change? What is the purpose of the SSI? Why is the information needed earlier? Does having that information give the police, who obviously think that it is required, a better chance to get the application granted?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

Thank you. That makes sense. There is a gap. I just wanted to be clear before we come to a conclusion. We always have to be careful about spent convictions—if they are included, it must be for a reason. I just wanted to be sure that what we are doing is proportionate, and I am satisfied about that.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

Right. I see.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

You said “unspent convictions”. Does the order also include spent convictions for lower-tariff applications?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

So, the SSI will make the process smoother. I ask for completeness: will the change to the process include information that was not previously given in relation to lower-tariff offences?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Pauline McNeill

That is the confusing bit. You are saying that the issue is one of process—I understand that—but you specifically said that the new process will include lower-tariff offences, whereas it used to apply to higher-tariff offences only. That looks like a substantial change.