The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1493 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I turn to MAPPA. I have a basic understanding of the approach, so you can correct me if you think that I am wrong. The underlying philosophy of MAPPA is to identify risk to the public. It goes without saying that domestic abuse and domestic violence are very serious offences. However, the MAPPA approach tries to identify where the offender is a risk to more than one person, so not only to the victim but also to the public. Is that your understanding? Correct me if you think that that is wrong.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Does that mean that you do not think that we should focus specifically on boys?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I am still not clear. We know what MAPPA is. Are you saying that there would be a role for the MAPPA response in relation to the register? Would organisations that are involved in it go back and identify people off the register whom they think pose the same risk as the people whom they are currently monitoring?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
So, they would all be covered by MAPPA.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Do you not then see a distinction between risk to the victim and the wider question of risk to the public? Not everyone on that register will pose the same risk. Why would you want to use the MAPPA resource for every single offender on the register?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
So, you are saying that everyone who meets the test and is on the notification register would be covered by MAPPA monitoring because you think that all offenders—every single one of them—pose a risk both to the victim and to the public. Is that your position?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
So, do you want MAPPA requirements on those offenders who are on the register?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I want to follow on from Katy Clark’s line of questioning about the need to tackle misogyny in schools. You said—and I agree—that we need to do something different, but do you agree that, in order to get longer-term results in the prevention of domestic abuse, domestic violence and sexual violence, we need to tackle misogyny among boys and young men? Is that not more of a priority than dealing with offenders at the other end?
We do need to tackle misogyny among the youngest boys. I have done some work in schools with Katy Clark, and we heard boys as young as 10 and 11 giving cause for concern, due to the attitudes that they are already forming. Do you agree that some consideration should be given to what we do at that end of the spectrum?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Everyone?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
And then it is decided under MAPPA?