Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 14 September 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 53 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts, Delays and Workforce

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Do you mean between the preliminary trial and the trial?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts and Court Users

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

I have two questions. Yesterday, a paper was sent to us by the Children and Young People’s Centre for Justice. It is all about the gaps in the law and the position of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child—you might be familiar with it. The paper says that article 12 does not cover the child’s right to communicate during their case hearing, but includes their collective ability to communicate. It also says that there is currently no provision in place for independent advocacy for a child accused in the court system, despite a similar provision existing for a child appearing before a children’s hearing panel. Rhona Willder, can you explain why we arrived at that point?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts, Delays and Workforce

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Does the Crown Office want to say anything about that?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts, Delays and Workforce

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Is that one of the barriers to forensic evidence being available?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts and Court Users

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

So, we have legislated for that in relation to children’s panels, but not for the court system.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts and Court Users

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Thank you, that is very helpful.

My other question is slightly different. The paper talks about the need to ensure that a child is not compelled to give testimony, to confess or to acknowledge guilt, and stresses that the term “compelled” should be interpreted broadly. The Parliament legislated to define a child as someone aged 18 or under. What are your views are in relation to those general provisions?

I represent the Glasgow region, and there is a concern in a lot of Glasgow communities about the fact that perpetrators who are defined as a child under the law—for instance, because they are 17—are committing pretty serious crimes but are not coming anywhere near court. I have a serious concern about applying that approach to someone who is accused of using a weapon or of another serious crime.

I know that children’s units deal with some of those cases, and that it is not a matter for you in particular. You might want to try to convince me that I am wrong to be concerned about that, but we are hearing concerns from communities across Scotland about how we have defined a child in relation to some of those offences. What is your view on that issue?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Courts and Court Users

Meeting date: 9 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Thank you. Debbie, you might have a slightly different view on this.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prison Operations

Meeting date: 2 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

So, something has to change.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prison Operations

Meeting date: 2 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

We do not have a lot of time to do it—is that fair?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prison Operations

Meeting date: 2 September 2026

Pauline McNeill

Thank you. I will ask David Mackie about that, because he is the person who is most commonly quoted on the treatment of remand prisoners and the figures around acquittal. He will correct me if I am wrong, but a high percentage of people who are held on remand go on to be acquitted, which is utterly shocking. Something is wrong here, is it not? I am reading that the figure is 57 per cent, but that does not seem right.