The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Thank you very much.
Pam, you said that we need to do something differently, and I agree with you. However, do you not think that, to do something differently, we should maybe start at—actually, convener, this question is probably not about part 1, so do you want me to leave it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I have been on the Criminal Justice Committee for five years so can we take it as read that I understand the seriousness of the offence? That is not why I am asking the question. I am trying to get some clarity. There is an argument that, if we had a smaller register, there would be more chance of monitoring the people who are going to put women at the highest risk. In your proposal, is there no requirement to assess risk? I think that the answer to that is no.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
You have talked about MAPPA quite a lot. How does your proposal for a register relate to that approach?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I was just wondering what you thought about it, though. Do you not think that the focus in education should be on boys? We both agree that violence against women and girls is primarily committed by men, but you think that education should not be specifically—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. First, I acknowledge the amount of work that the member has done. Having been in charge of a members’ bill myself, although it was a wee bit smaller, I realise that there is a lot of work involved.
You have sort of answered this question but what I am interested in hearing about more concisely is not who supports the bill and their evidence, but what the primary purpose of the register would be, as far as you are concerned.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Sorry, can you just answer my question. I am trying to establish the primary purpose, which you are saying is monitoring. Obviously, I recognise that anything that is done could provide a deterrent, but you are saying that the notification requirements and the monitoring would make the difference. Do you think that any aspect of the register should identify the risk related to an individual offender? Is it correct that anyone who had been convicted of a prison sentence on indictment for 12 months or more would qualify to be on the register for domestic abuse offences?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I will ask another question about the register. Did you consider the stigma that might be attached to children and families where the father—or mother, for that matter—is on such a register, should the bill be passed?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
That is fair enough.
Finally, you will recall that I quite closely questioned the minister, Siobhian Brown, at our previous meeting. The Government has said that it does not support the bill, but she did eventually say to me that there are gaps. Have you given that some thought since then? Any bill that gets to stage 2 would be amended anyway, so have you given any consideration to how you could get the Government on board?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
I turn to MAPPA. I have a basic understanding of the approach, so you can correct me if you think that I am wrong. The underlying philosophy of MAPPA is to identify risk to the public. It goes without saying that domestic abuse and domestic violence are very serious offences. However, the MAPPA approach tries to identify where the offender is a risk to more than one person, so not only to the victim but also to the public. Is that your understanding? Correct me if you think that that is wrong.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Pauline McNeill
Does that mean that you do not think that we should focus specifically on boys?