Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1838 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

Should we have more regulation around whether or not to pay ransoms, given what has been said about where the money might be going?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

ACC Stuart Houston, in your submission, you said that there has been a rise in cybercrime and

“physical harm with online groups exploiting vulnerable individuals online to self-harm and share the content.”

Will you say anything more about the profile of those people? Is it mainly children and young adults? Is it mainly girls? Do you have any information on the gender split for sextortion? Any of that information would be useful.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

Are you sceptical about that?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Cybercrime

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

I am not trivialising it. I am just saying that there are reports in which people say that that is what they think happened.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

The fan-led survey announced that fans want action on venue closures, ticketing and audience safety, and that they want further support for grass-roots music venues. Not surprisingly, 93 per cent of fans agreed that there should be a £1 ticket levy on arena and stadium live-music events to fund grass-roots venues. Further, 85 per cent of fans believe that there should be a restriction on new residents filing noise complaints near existing venues. That is an old issue, and it is one that impacts my Glasgow region in relation to Barrowlands and King Tut’s.

Will the cabinet secretary set out which issues raised in the survey, including the ticket levy, the Government can support? I agree that Scottish people love their live music, and it would be good for the Government to be seen to be active in delivering such support.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of Scotland participating in a United Kingdom-wide fan-led review of the live music industry, in light of the recent UK-wide survey of the industry. (S6O-04640)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Pauline McNeill

Deepfake abuse has been described as a “new frontier” of violence against women, and the United Kingdom Government plans to make creating sexually explicit deepfake images a criminal offence. The cabinet secretary will be aware that it is the creation of the images that is the issue.

In January, the First Minister said to me that the Government was considering whether there was a gap in the law, and that it would discuss whether it could make a joint effort on the issue with the UK Government. Will the cabinet secretary update me on whether there has been any further thinking about making the creation of such images a criminal offence?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Pauline McNeill

I start by saying that the Government’s amendments are the most significant and important changes to the creation of the sexual offences court and I put on the record my thanks to the cabinet secretary and her officials, who I know have worked hard to achieve that.

One of the reasons why I moved my earlier amendments on the structure of the sexual offences court was that rights of audience would remain the same if we went for the formula that I proposed last week. In the event that the Parliament passes the formulation that we are talking about today, I will be pleased that we have resolved the issue.

For clarity, I presume that it is pretty obvious that rape cases would attract a senior prosecutor and rights of audience for either counsel or a solicitor advocate. The position is less clear for non-rape cases. The amendments identify crimes that might attract sentences of more than five years and, as has to happen at the moment, those cases would previously have been indicted to the High Court. That protects the rights of audience, so that accused persons will be represented in the same way as they were previously. That is really good.

I have something for discussion at stage 3. Forgive me if I do not explain this properly, but it is also important to look in the round at what would have happened in the High Court in relation to the prosecution of cases, which would have been either by a procurator fiscal with experience appointed by the Lord Advocate or by an advocate depute with a three-year term. I am not sure, because it has not been discussed at any stage, whether there would be a corresponding expectation in cases that would attract those sentences, and whether anything needs to be said about who prosecutes those cases. For completeness, I thought that it would be worth mentioning that and having a discussion about it before stage 3.

I will not move my amendments. There is no need to do so because they relate to a previous formula. I welcome the cabinet secretary’s amendments.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Pauline McNeill

So there are three categories of people—High Court judges, temporary High Court judges and sheriffs—who can preside over rape or any other sexual offences case.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Pauline McNeill

Thank you very much.