The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1838 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
Should we have more regulation around whether or not to pay ransoms, given what has been said about where the money might be going?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
ACC Stuart Houston, in your submission, you said that there has been a rise in cybercrime and
“physical harm with online groups exploiting vulnerable individuals online to self-harm and share the content.”
Will you say anything more about the profile of those people? Is it mainly children and young adults? Is it mainly girls? Do you have any information on the gender split for sextortion? Any of that information would be useful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
Are you sceptical about that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
I am not trivialising it. I am just saying that there are reports in which people say that that is what they think happened.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
The fan-led survey announced that fans want action on venue closures, ticketing and audience safety, and that they want further support for grass-roots music venues. Not surprisingly, 93 per cent of fans agreed that there should be a £1 ticket levy on arena and stadium live-music events to fund grass-roots venues. Further, 85 per cent of fans believe that there should be a restriction on new residents filing noise complaints near existing venues. That is an old issue, and it is one that impacts my Glasgow region in relation to Barrowlands and King Tut’s.
Will the cabinet secretary set out which issues raised in the survey, including the ticket levy, the Government can support? I agree that Scottish people love their live music, and it would be good for the Government to be seen to be active in delivering such support.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of Scotland participating in a United Kingdom-wide fan-led review of the live music industry, in light of the recent UK-wide survey of the industry. (S6O-04640)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pauline McNeill
Deepfake abuse has been described as a “new frontier” of violence against women, and the United Kingdom Government plans to make creating sexually explicit deepfake images a criminal offence. The cabinet secretary will be aware that it is the creation of the images that is the issue.
In January, the First Minister said to me that the Government was considering whether there was a gap in the law, and that it would discuss whether it could make a joint effort on the issue with the UK Government. Will the cabinet secretary update me on whether there has been any further thinking about making the creation of such images a criminal offence?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Pauline McNeill
I start by saying that the Government’s amendments are the most significant and important changes to the creation of the sexual offences court and I put on the record my thanks to the cabinet secretary and her officials, who I know have worked hard to achieve that.
One of the reasons why I moved my earlier amendments on the structure of the sexual offences court was that rights of audience would remain the same if we went for the formula that I proposed last week. In the event that the Parliament passes the formulation that we are talking about today, I will be pleased that we have resolved the issue.
For clarity, I presume that it is pretty obvious that rape cases would attract a senior prosecutor and rights of audience for either counsel or a solicitor advocate. The position is less clear for non-rape cases. The amendments identify crimes that might attract sentences of more than five years and, as has to happen at the moment, those cases would previously have been indicted to the High Court. That protects the rights of audience, so that accused persons will be represented in the same way as they were previously. That is really good.
I have something for discussion at stage 3. Forgive me if I do not explain this properly, but it is also important to look in the round at what would have happened in the High Court in relation to the prosecution of cases, which would have been either by a procurator fiscal with experience appointed by the Lord Advocate or by an advocate depute with a three-year term. I am not sure, because it has not been discussed at any stage, whether there would be a corresponding expectation in cases that would attract those sentences, and whether anything needs to be said about who prosecutes those cases. For completeness, I thought that it would be worth mentioning that and having a discussion about it before stage 3.
I will not move my amendments. There is no need to do so because they relate to a previous formula. I welcome the cabinet secretary’s amendments.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Pauline McNeill
So there are three categories of people—High Court judges, temporary High Court judges and sheriffs—who can preside over rape or any other sexual offences case.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you very much.