The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1524 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
It is in the committee’s interests, convener.
The Energy Bill is important, but there are obviously issues with it, and I am pleased to hear that you have been talking with different stakeholders separately or together with the Scottish Government. The committee has looked at the bill and has produced a report on it and the legislative consent memorandum.
One of our concerns, which we have also reflected here today, was about the importance of investment in infrastructure, especially the speed of decision making and deployment of that investment. In paragraph 71 of our report on the bill and the LCM, we talk about the combination of the Energy Bill and the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill giving powers to the environment secretary to make decisions. The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is a UK minister, but environment itself is devolved. We are therefore concerned that the
“overlapping matrix of rules, obligations and permissions”
could have a “chilling” impact on investment, which none of us would want to happen. I do not know whether this is your direct responsibility or whether it is a subject for today’s discussions, but is that on your radar? After all, it is in everybody’s interests that decisions are made promptly and securely.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
That is fine. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
We have had hydro for a long time, and, as you will be aware, there are significant proposals for its expansion in Scotland that are being held up. You said that talks are going on, but the proposals are being held up. Is there an understanding of the need for pace—which we heard about from your colleague—and flexibility to ensure that we have access to this fantastic resource?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
Finally—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
I have another follow-up question. You said that the UK Government had rejected the proposition in the House of Lords to give Ofgem a statutory responsibility to achieve net zero. Given that decarbonising energy is essential to achieving net zero—and that achieving net zero is essential to tackling climate change—why would you not? It would be quite helpful if you could give us, on the record, your rationale for currently rejecting that amendment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
I will not refer to that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
The independent just transition commission has suggested that effective communication requires the plans to be co-designed, which has to be a two-way process. It is important to demonstrate that stakeholder feedback can lead to policy changes, so will the Scottish Government seek to do that through the co-design process for the just transition plans? For Grangemouth, who would you define as the stakeholders?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
What about the stakeholders?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
Who is the cabinet secretary with responsibility for the just transition plan for Grangemouth?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Fiona Hyslop
We welcome the fact that we are taking a place-based approach to Grangemouth. Others might want to touch on the prospects for the transition of the site itself and whether the industrial processes can move into the hydrogen sector and the Acorn project, for example. However, all things being well—with the industrial site being able to transition—it could effectively do that in parallel with, or in a separate universe from, the community itself.
Focusing on the community of Grangemouth, we know from previous consultations that one of its key concerns is transport. If everything is successful, we will be expanding the number of jobs at Grangemouth, but that will bring in more cars because public transport in the area is not what it should be. There is no rail link, although there was one in the past. There is quite a serious point to consider about what success looks like and how transport will be critical.
Housing will also be critical. We have been told that, if local businesses that are not on the industrial site but are in Grangemouth are to benefit and grow, they will need more footfall, which means making sure that people live in the area. There is also the challenge of having the quality of housing to attract people and make them want to live there and spend what, we hope, will be their good wages.
To what extent will the just transition plan address those issues? They are quite independent of the transition of the industrial site, but we already know that they are challenges from the many consultations about Grangemouth that have been carried out.