The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
In this case, you have considered all that and said, “What we are doing is proportionate.” However, many members around this table are frustrated because the policy is not proportionate or balanced—that is definitely the view that has been expressed in the consultation responses. There were two fishermen sitting in this room who were upset about what has happened to their communities in the past 20 years. They might have felt differently if they thought that there had been an outcome from the closure, but they do not think that; they feel that their communities have been harmed by the closure, and they are now facing a three-year extension to it.
Nobody really knows what is happening with the closure. Some groups are saying, “Maybe we should do it, because what will happen if environmental non-governmental organisations come in and try to blow this up into something bigger?” I am not suggesting that the ENGOs would do that, but those groups are scared about things getting even worse if they were to do so. Others are saying, “Look, don’t go ahead with this—it’s madness. We don’t know what we’re doing.”
Despite all that, and despite all the consultation responses—which I am sure that you have read—do you still think that the closure is a proportionate response?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
Beatrice Wishart touched on the fact that biannual closures might be better than the three-year period that is proposed in the SSI. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that you are saying that you have suggested a three-year period because that three years’ worth of data is worth having. Beyond the need for that data, is there any evidence that demonstrates why a three-year period is necessary?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
But not with the order in front of us.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
I have a quick question on the back of the one that Emma Harper asked about what might happen if the SSI is annulled. I think that I am right in saying that, originally, it was a voluntary scheme. Therefore, if what is proposed in the SSI were not to progress, work could still be done with the local fishermen in the immediate term. There could be a voluntary closure while you developed a new SSI and a new programme that might receive a better consultation response.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
In terms of the cod stocks in other locations, yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
Well, that is a very good question. How should I define “significant”? I guess that what I am trying to get at is that the prawns are very significant here, are they not? Why are we putting in place measures that are going to affect that industry? Does that make sense? I do not know whether what I am saying is coming across to you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
I do not have much more to say. I appreciate what the cabinet secretary says—I really do. This is not an easy decision for any of us, and we all want the best for the region, but I stand by what I have said. I think that Ariane Burgess is right, and you always know that something is wrong when the Greens and the Conservatives start coming together. There is an issue. Whether we consider the expert advice or advice from people on the ground, there is clearly an issue. The order is clearly not the right approach.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
I am pretty easy about what is proposed in amendment 214. I have asked for reviews of primary legislation before. I know that it is not always helpful or necessary to provide for such reviews, and I am not necessarily sure that it is in this case. With amendment 214, I was simply seeking to highlight concerns that were raised when we discussed the issue during the evidence taking at stage 1, so I will be happy not to move it. However, I would like the minister to recognise that there could be difficulties and to guarantee that the effectiveness of the merger will be monitored.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Tim Eagle
I have very little to say on amendment 214. I lodged it on the basis of some concerns that were raised during the committee’s evidence sessions, but I heard what the minister said this morning and I will work with him on the matter before stage 3.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Tim Eagle
I will first just remind everybody of my entry in the register of members’ interests.
My amendment 155 simply changes the section heading of section 40A of the 1993 act to avoid any possible confusion between a crofting-specific notice given under that section and either the agricultural census or the national census, which occurs every 10 years. I thank the minister for working with me on the drafting of the amendment.