The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 628 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
Did you see a copy of the rural support plan. It has not been published, so have you seen a copy in the background?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
Oh right. Have we seen a draft copy? I do not think that we have seen a draft copy. If anybody wants to send that on, please feel free, because I would love to see a draft copy of the rural support plan.
I should probably declare an interest. I am an active farmer. I say that I am an active farmer, but I have barely anything left. I feel that I have done, and my neighbours have done, everything that we have been asked to do for the past 20 years. We were members of the countryside premium scheme, the environmental stewardship scheme and the AECS, and we have been in tiers 1 and 2 constantly.
I guess that some are saying that ministers are not making the tough decisions that they need to make, but, equally—you are obviously still going through the budget, but I had a quick look at it yesterday and the big numbers do not lie—there has been no change in the budget. When we come to the just transition question that our discussion has hinged on, we see that there is no money there, either. You cannot have a cliff edge—I think that that is the point that the NFUS has always made, is not it? If you have a cliff edge, you get the devastation of crofters and farmers across Scotland, because loads of people just fall off. What would that look like? I guess that, to get what you all seem to be driving at, you think that there needs to be an extra bit of just transition funding in place.
09:45
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
The energy is picking up, I think.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I have two quick questions to finish. The first is around contingency. If we do not get the behavioural changes that the climate change plan sets out, do we need to build some contingencies into the plan, and if we do, what should they look like?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I think that this has indeed mostly been answered, but I agree that it is worth asking the question, as it is critical. To what extent is a broad-based planting target meaningful on its own?
We have referred to that already but, for certainty, could you answer that question again?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Tim Eagle
Part of my question may have already been answered, but I have a three-part question about funding. The first part is to ask whether you have any further thoughts about Scottish Government funding. There has been some concern about that in the past and there was significant representation on that when we held a panel discussion many months ago. I know that was spoken about earlier today. The second part of my question is about the role of private finance in the plans. Finally, I do not know much about it, but the draft CCP talks about a
“responsible, values-driven, high-integrity natural capital market”.
If you could explain more about what that means to you, that would be great.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Tim Eagle
Six months ago, you granted to three organisations a funding package for the next two years. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Tim Eagle
It does not work. People are telling us that it does not work.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Tim Eagle
No, you could have put in place a new scheme by now. Earlier, you talked about the need for clearer thinking on how we can do more. You have had five years to do that thinking. Does Mr Burgess’s department have enough staff? We have not seen the rural support plan. We do not know what is going on. The NFUS is arguing against greening. My understanding is that the good food nation SSIs have now all been pulled. Therefore, do you think that we have a fair point in asking what is going on behind the scenes in relation to future agricultural policy in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Tim Eagle
It is 17 December, minister. Today, you are coming to me, as a member of this committee, and saying, “Hey, agree this—and if you don’t, we’re really scuppered.” I have got no option. I am being forced into approving a scheme that I do not think is right, with a load of stuff that—as Ariane Burgess has presented—we do not even think is right for the market, but there is nothing that we can do about that because it is too late in the day. It does not sound as though it has been discussed behind the scenes that there might be a huge impact on the Scottish budget if we do not approve the SSI. You are forcing my hand.