The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 553 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
Certainly. I need a break.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
Yes, certainly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
There is a real concern here. If I got you right, you have just said that a person A can come in and buy a 15,000-hectare plot of land and then decide that they want to do peatland restoration, woodland planting and all manner of different things on that land that meet the Scottish biodiversity strategy or whatever it might be, and person B or C, or however many people there are around the outside, regardless of what they want to do on their land, might then have to face the consequences or have certain controls because of what person A has decided to do on their land. Is that what you are saying?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
I am talking about incentives.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
Have you had ideas about that during the build-up to the good food nation plan and all the work that has gone on for years? The term “have regard” is pretty common nowadays, is it not? Are there other methods that are used in other laws that you can use in this one?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
The minister is providing some reassurance and said earlier that he was open to discussion prior to stage 3. On that basis, I am willing not to move the amendments today. We can come back to the issue at stage 3, after further discussion.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
I might be going back a wee bit here. I do not know about you, cabinet secretary, but my head has been so full of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill that I have found it hard to come back to the subject of the good food nation.
Mr Hamilton spoke about timescales. You laid the draft plan, which we had 60 sitting days to review. You must lay the final plan within three months, but I note that there is no timescale attached to the “have regard to” duty. Is my understanding of that correct? Am I right in thinking that nothing prohibits you from taking the SSI away, holding a bit more discussion with some of the stakeholders who have raised concerns and then relaying the instrument? That would not cause problems for any of the timescales in the 2022 act.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
I have no further comments, convener. I press amendment 215.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Tim Eagle
As I understand it, you are not saying that NatureScot should have an involvement. It is about whether NatureScot sits on the panel or acts as an observer to it. As things stand, it can always feed in its information, can it not? It just does not have powers beyond that, given that it is a regulatory body. To stop any risk of a conflict of interest, why not keep that section as it is?