Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 16 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 553 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

Certainly. I need a break.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

Yes, certainly.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

Okay.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

There is a real concern here. If I got you right, you have just said that a person A can come in and buy a 15,000-hectare plot of land and then decide that they want to do peatland restoration, woodland planting and all manner of different things on that land that meet the Scottish biodiversity strategy or whatever it might be, and person B or C, or however many people there are around the outside, regardless of what they want to do on their land, might then have to face the consequences or have certain controls because of what person A has decided to do on their land. Is that what you are saying?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

I am talking about incentives.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

Have you had ideas about that during the build-up to the good food nation plan and all the work that has gone on for years? The term “have regard” is pretty common nowadays, is it not? Are there other methods that are used in other laws that you can use in this one?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

The minister is providing some reassurance and said earlier that he was open to discussion prior to stage 3. On that basis, I am willing not to move the amendments today. We can come back to the issue at stage 3, after further discussion.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

I might be going back a wee bit here. I do not know about you, cabinet secretary, but my head has been so full of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill that I have found it hard to come back to the subject of the good food nation.

Mr Hamilton spoke about timescales. You laid the draft plan, which we had 60 sitting days to review. You must lay the final plan within three months, but I note that there is no timescale attached to the “have regard to” duty. Is my understanding of that correct? Am I right in thinking that nothing prohibits you from taking the SSI away, holding a bit more discussion with some of the stakeholders who have raised concerns and then relaying the instrument? That would not cause problems for any of the timescales in the 2022 act.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

I have no further comments, convener. I press amendment 215.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Tim Eagle

As I understand it, you are not saying that NatureScot should have an involvement. It is about whether NatureScot sits on the panel or acts as an observer to it. As things stand, it can always feed in its information, can it not? It just does not have powers beyond that, given that it is a regulatory body. To stop any risk of a conflict of interest, why not keep that section as it is?