The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 396 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The bill sees the addition of the word “environment” to the things that NatureScot must account for. What was the purpose of that addition and how will you assess that? What does it mean in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. Thank you for coming in.
My questions are about the 30 by 30 targets for 30 per cent of land and sea to be protected by 2030. I believe that the legislative team thought about making changes to legislation to help to make that doable in the foreseeable future, but there is nothing in the bill on that. What did you think it might have been useful to include in the legislation, and why are those things not in the bill? How do you think that you can make progress on the 30 by 30 targets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
If you are not going to implement legislative changes on the 30 by 30 targets, how will you make progress on them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I will come to the point on “have regard to” in a second, because I love a bit of legal terminology.
First, I go back to Emma Harper’s point about economic opportunities in national parks, which is critical. I want to double check that I have this right. Section 1 of the 2000 act sets out four principal national park aims and, in the bill, you slightly tinker with those aims but not very much. However, section 5(2)(1) of the bill amends the 2000 act by introducing a new section 1(2), which adds six new aims that are around issues such as the natural environment, biodiversity, climate and access. Those aims expand upon the four main national park aims, but none of them refers to the economy or economic development in a national park.
That concerns me slightly, because lots of businesses, not just farmers, operate in the parks. Why not add another aim that is about enhancing and protecting the sustainable economic development of those areas?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I think that my question has just been answered. I was going to ask what response you have had from the Scottish Government and what your big summary message to us is. You have just said that it is not just the Scottish Government but all of us as MSPs, in representing our constituents, who have a responsibility to be pushing and questioning and constantly asking. Unless there is anything else that you want to add, I think that you just summarised the situation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
It is an interesting point that we hide smaller groups because of a bigger subset. Perhaps I made the wrong assumption, but I thought that we would factor that into such research. However, your evidence is that we do not. Your research allowed smaller groups to have a voice, which otherwise they might not have had. It might not even be in Inverness. Elgin or Dingwall, for example, have slightly larger populations that are significantly bigger than west coast villages with a handful of people.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. It has been a really interesting discussion. I have to admit that I have just been looking up your briefing papers on human rights budgeting to try to get it into my head. I might take you up on the offer to meet you separately to go through some of that, because I am struggling a wee bit to understand how human rights come into the national performance framework and national outcomes and then into delivery within the financial envelope that we have. I hope that, one day, I will get my head around it.
My question is about the Scottish household survey. Interestingly, there was broad satisfaction across Scotland, in rural and urban areas, with services such as schools and health, although the satisfaction rates for public transport in rural areas were suggested to be worse.
How did you factor other surveys, such as the Scottish household survey, into your research? Do you have any comments on the comparison between your work and the household survey?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
In fairness, I think that Rhoda Grant said at the very beginning of her question that none of us doubts the outcome that we are trying to get—which is incentivising business, helping us to be more sustainable and so on—and that it is just about how it works in practice and making sure that it becomes not a burden to the agriculture industry but, rather, a positive thing. It is important to monitor that all the way through.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
That is because it is messy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I have not explained myself well. My point is about the rural support plan, not about the detail. I thought that the idea behind the rural support plan was that it would underpin all the new grant schemes and that it would be a document that showed the Scottish Government’s outcomes so that farmers could apply for support that fits the outcomes that you are looking for. Without that document, it feels as if we cannot do that, because your route map does not give that level of detail.