The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 628 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
You have just made the assumption that you will get the regulations through.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
So, you are 100 per cent confident that you can target your agricultural policy specifically at the needs of Scottish farmers, crofters and smallholders without risk by following EU legislation and rules.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I have one final question. I was trying to find my notes, but I cannot find them.
Back in March—I think it was—we had a round table with various members of the agricultural industry, including some members of ARIOB. There were some positive remarks, but there were some pretty scathing remarks, too, about how they felt they had been treated in the process.
You have made a lot of comments today about moving at a pace that suits farmers and taking people with you. I just want to double-check, however, because I am concerned that this is quite late in the day and the reform route map that was set out is not really coming to pass in quite the way we all imagined that it would. How can you give me certainty, given what I heard back in March, that ARIOB is working and that stakeholders feel included in the process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a question about how the system will work on the ground, in practice. You carry out inspections every year. To what extent will you relax the rigour with which you apply any penalties as farmers and crofters adapt over the next couple of years? Are you prepared to be a little more lenient as farmers transition?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I will talk about the increase in EFA coverage up to 7 per cent. Next year, 5 per cent of arable areas must be maintained as EFAs—for which there are four new options—and, from 2027, that will go up to 7 per cent. NFUS has raised significant concerns about that. It thinks that there needs to be a review of whether that will result in a fully proportionate environmental benefit, although I recognise that some environmental groups have suggested that, actually, there should be a further increase. How did you decide on that 7 per cent level from 2027, and why did you choose that timeline?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
The figure is not based on any rigorous science or advice. Is it purely a compromise figure?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Do you agree that an expanded list of options under tier 2 would do the following two things? First, it would allow farmers, crofters, smallholders and everybody across Scotland to maximise benefits to the environment and biodiversity by pooling what really works on their farms—including in Orkney, which will suffer quite significantly under the changes, because lots of new farmers and crofters are coming in. Secondly, it would meet your targets. An expanded list of options would meet your need to deliver sustainable and regenerative agriculture for the future.
I want to go back to the IT system. Are you saying that your plan is still to have an expanded list of options under tier 2? Is the IT system capable of delivering that in the near future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I get your point. I think, and past ARIOB minutes show, that stakeholders expected an expanded list of options under tier 2. Apart from the additional four, we have not got that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. It is not in your thinking just now.
What do you mean by that statement? Let us talk about the list of options that were going to be available, which would have been a bit like the old LMOs—the land management options. There was an understanding among various stakeholders, both within and outwith ARIOB, that, under tier 2, there would be a much greater list of options that would allow Scotland to become, as you said, “a world leader in sustainable and regenerative agriculture”. What we have is 11 to 12 options, which does not seem very many. Are you giving me an absolute guarantee that it was not the IT system that limited your ability to provide a greater list of options at this point?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I have not been here that long, and you can correct me if I am wrong, but I have a final question about respecting Parliament. You set out these proposals to farmers months ago. I know that because a letter came through my door—which reminds me that I should declare a registered interest as a small farmer. However, we are only debating this now and the implementation for fallow, for example, comes in on 1 January, as it does for all EFAs. Is that fair? Is it right that the committee and the Parliament should get to discuss the regulations only one month before they are implemented, although you told everybody else months ago? Do you think that that shows Parliament respect?