Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 628 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

You have just made the assumption that you will get the regulations through.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

So, you are 100 per cent confident that you can target your agricultural policy specifically at the needs of Scottish farmers, crofters and smallholders without risk by following EU legislation and rules.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I have one final question. I was trying to find my notes, but I cannot find them.

Back in March—I think it was—we had a round table with various members of the agricultural industry, including some members of ARIOB. There were some positive remarks, but there were some pretty scathing remarks, too, about how they felt they had been treated in the process.

You have made a lot of comments today about moving at a pace that suits farmers and taking people with you. I just want to double-check, however, because I am concerned that this is quite late in the day and the reform route map that was set out is not really coming to pass in quite the way we all imagined that it would. How can you give me certainty, given what I heard back in March, that ARIOB is working and that stakeholders feel included in the process?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I have a question about how the system will work on the ground, in practice. You carry out inspections every year. To what extent will you relax the rigour with which you apply any penalties as farmers and crofters adapt over the next couple of years? Are you prepared to be a little more lenient as farmers transition?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I will talk about the increase in EFA coverage up to 7 per cent. Next year, 5 per cent of arable areas must be maintained as EFAs—for which there are four new options—and, from 2027, that will go up to 7 per cent. NFUS has raised significant concerns about that. It thinks that there needs to be a review of whether that will result in a fully proportionate environmental benefit, although I recognise that some environmental groups have suggested that, actually, there should be a further increase. How did you decide on that 7 per cent level from 2027, and why did you choose that timeline?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

The figure is not based on any rigorous science or advice. Is it purely a compromise figure?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

Do you agree that an expanded list of options under tier 2 would do the following two things? First, it would allow farmers, crofters, smallholders and everybody across Scotland to maximise benefits to the environment and biodiversity by pooling what really works on their farms—including in Orkney, which will suffer quite significantly under the changes, because lots of new farmers and crofters are coming in. Secondly, it would meet your targets. An expanded list of options would meet your need to deliver sustainable and regenerative agriculture for the future.

I want to go back to the IT system. Are you saying that your plan is still to have an expanded list of options under tier 2? Is the IT system capable of delivering that in the near future?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I get your point. I think, and past ARIOB minutes show, that stakeholders expected an expanded list of options under tier 2. Apart from the additional four, we have not got that.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

Okay. It is not in your thinking just now.

What do you mean by that statement? Let us talk about the list of options that were going to be available, which would have been a bit like the old LMOs—the land management options. There was an understanding among various stakeholders, both within and outwith ARIOB, that, under tier 2, there would be a much greater list of options that would allow Scotland to become, as you said, “a world leader in sustainable and regenerative agriculture”. What we have is 11 to 12 options, which does not seem very many. Are you giving me an absolute guarantee that it was not the IT system that limited your ability to provide a greater list of options at this point?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Tim Eagle

I have not been here that long, and you can correct me if I am wrong, but I have a final question about respecting Parliament. You set out these proposals to farmers months ago. I know that because a letter came through my door—which reminds me that I should declare a registered interest as a small farmer. However, we are only debating this now and the implementation for fallow, for example, comes in on 1 January, as it does for all EFAs. Is that fair? Is it right that the committee and the Parliament should get to discuss the regulations only one month before they are implemented, although you told everybody else months ago? Do you think that that shows Parliament respect?