The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 396 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I get that you think that the protections are robust, but all the evidence that we have heard suggests that many others do not think that they are. What are your thoughts on changing that?
To go back to the question that I inadvertently asked earlier, you consulted last year on adapting and improving the habitat regulations. That consultation had two elements: one was around creating more flexibility to designate a site based on an ecosystem or habitat approach, and the other was about encouraging more proactive management. What did you learn from the consultation? You have not brought anything into the bill from that consultation, so what came out of it that led you to instead move to take this broad power?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
You could define regression within the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
This is an interesting conversation. I appreciate your putting on record that the aim is not to take away the protections that we have in place but to enable further movement on biodiversity or climate change. The convener made a point about the risk. You keep setting out the four areas in the bill, but if the bill had only one of those, such as net zero or climate, is there is a risk that your Government or a future Government could say, “My aims for climate override my aims for that particular habitat”? Do you see that the approach could be quite broad if, for example, we were talking about onshore or offshore wind?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
So, it is purely about that flexibility.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Minister, you are right to say that there is a fair bit of good will out there at the moment. However—and this follows on from Mark Ruskell’s question—we have heard in evidence that there is a bit of uncertainty about the vagueness of the phrase “nature restoration”. How do you intend the guidance to give clarity about what that means and in what circumstances it might be used?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
My understanding of the bill is that NatureScot must “have regard to” the code of practice. There have been some queries about whether that is a fair or strong enough term. What are your thoughts on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I am conscious of the time, but I want to quickly touch on an issue. My understanding is that, if there is a control scheme in place, it is registered against the title to the land. We have heard in evidence that that could potentially create a burden on the land, which would transfer if it were sold. Have you given any thought to the potential effects on land value and marketability?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Rather than go down the non-regression route, REACH offers a slightly different route, which has a very clearly defined scope for the core aims and protected provisions and how the powers can be used. What is your current thinking about how you might adapt that part of the bill to better reflect the evidence that we have heard?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Sorry. My problem is that I skipped a question because you brought me in earlier, convener, on question 8. I retract the question that I asked and will come back to it in about an hour’s time.