The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 302 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Roz McCall
Another point that has come up is the idea of sunsetting Henry VIII powers, so that there would be a way of closing off a power that was not being utilised. What do you think of that suggestion?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Roz McCall
The committee has heard substantial evidence from witnesses that framework legislation is being used more frequently. What is your view on that? If we are using it more frequently, why is that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Roz McCall
You say that there is no evidence of framework legislation happening more frequently, but we are getting a lot of information that says that it is. On what basis are you making that judgment? To turn that around, what evidence is there to say that it is not happening more frequently?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Roz McCall
I was just interested to hear on what basis you came to that conclusion.
Some witnesses suggested that guidance on framework legislation should be put in place. We have highlighted that there is no definition, and you have come back on that. Should there be guidance from the legislature to the executive on when framework legislation may be appropriately introduced? Would any guidance that we put forward be a sort of halfway house, so to speak?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Roz McCall
You say that it would be an unhelpful process, but equally, your evidence just highlighted the fact that what started off as a non-framework bill ended up with additional secondary legislation-making powers by the end of the bill process. We do not have that definition and, because it is not there, the process is such that bills morph all the time and can become what could be seen as framework bills as they go through the process.
You say that putting guidance in place would not be helpful. I have a concern about that, which I will try to frame right way. If we took a view on whether legislation should be framework legislation, what would the Government’s view be on establishing principles to provide committees such as the DPLR Committee with clear means by which to assess and report on whether a bill is framework in nature, especially since they morph?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Roz McCall
That is very interesting.
Mr Jones, what is your opinion on what Mr Hedges has just said about Henry VIII powers and on the concern that Westminster could encroach on devolved legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Roz McCall
That is excellent—thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Roz McCall
In the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s fantastic piece of work on the Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill, the committee stated that
“The increasing use of ‘framework’ bills that ... provide future Governments with enabling powers”
does not provide “the best estimates” of all likely costs and
“undermines Parliamentary scrutiny. It also risks the Parliament passing legislation which may in the end, once outcomes are fully understood,”
lead to significant cost increases. I accept that. The bottom line, which I want to highlight, is
“whether ... the outcomes the bill seeks to deliver ... outweigh any financial or affordability considerations.”
It is the outcomes that I really want to question.
Given the ambiguity around what a framework bill is or is not, and given the fact that we sometimes do not know that even at the inception of the bill, how important are the outcomes? Should they outweigh any financial situation? Should that be sacrosanct? Are we not putting enough emphasis on outcomes in the first place? Is it about saying that we just do not know what a framework bill is at the outset and that we should do more, especially from a financial position?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Roz McCall
We are trying to drill down into what would be an effective form of scrutinising those powers. Are we saying, “We just don’t like them, so let’s not do it”? In your opinion, can we find a sensible, suitable way of scrutinising those powers and halting their use when need be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Roz McCall
Good morning, everybody. I would like to come back to you, Mr Gibson.