The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 816 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Lorna Slater
It is a bizarre proposal that Mr Carlaw puts to me. Clearly, no country should be committing war crimes. A country needing to defend itself from an illegal invasion, such as that of Russia, is a different matter to what the UK Government is currently doing, which is being complicit in a genocide that is being committed by Israel. We need to call that out when we see it. The UK should not be supplying weapons, munitions or intelligence to countries that are committing war crimes. That should go without saying.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Lorna Slater
I will take interventions during my closing speech.
The Scottish Government offered to review Scottish Enterprise’s human rights checks. While that has been going on, 10,000 more people have been killed in Gaza. The Scottish Government needs to urgently report on that review and provide Scottish Enterprise with a clear direction on the use of public funds, to ensure that Scotland meets its international obligations.
Many of these companies, which supposedly need Government support, are reporting huge profits, with BAE Systems reporting £3 billion-worth of profits last year alone. It is not at all clear that the megacorporations that rake in that kind of profit need our public money. BAE Systems, Raytheon and Leonardo have all received grants from Scottish Enterprise. BAE Systems is already the biggest arms company in Europe, and Raytheon is the second biggest in the world.
Every pound of public money needs to be spent carefully to ensure the maximum return on that investment. We need to make sure that public money goes to building wealth in Scotland and tackling our biggest challenges: stopping the climate catastrophe and eliminating child poverty. We need to make sure that it does not go into the pockets of multinational megacorporation arms dealers—I cannot believe that I have to say that.
Scottish public money would be better spent on supporting small businesses, co-operative businesses, social enterprises and rural businesses. Scotland’s small clean energy, nature restoration and organic food businesses would have made good use of that money, not to mention our NHS, trains and ferries.
Every pound of public money that is spent on the arms industry is a pound that is spent on misery, death and suffering. Scotland deserves better.
I move amendment S6M-17981.2, to leave out from “recognises” to end and insert:
“notes with concern that, despite the Scottish Government’s policy that public funds to the defence industry should focus on diversification, at least £8 million of Scottish Enterprise grants have been awarded to companies involved in arms dealing and manufacturing since 2019; further notes that a number of these businesses have directly supplied weapons and military equipment to Israel during its assault on Gaza; understands that, despite this, still no company has failed Scottish Enterprise human rights due diligence checks, and calls, therefore, on the Scottish Government to urgently report on its promised review of Scottish Enterprise’s human rights checks before the summer recess and to provide Scottish Enterprise with a clear direction on the use of public funds to ensure that Scotland meets its international obligations.”
16:24Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Lorna Slater
My apologies to fellow members for not taking interventions during my opening speech. I just wanted to get my remarks on the record, and I will be very happy to take interventions during my closing speech.
In response to Edward Mountain, I say that there is complete coherence in my remarks. I fully support my previous remarks on Ukraine and its fight against an oppressor in Russia’s illegal war. That does not send a mixed message on how we use public funding.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Lorna Slater
I am aware of the Laffer curve. I am also aware of where it has been discredited and where it applies. It applies specifically to income taxes and not to the kind of taxes that the Scottish Greens advocate, such as land value tax and wealth taxation.
Our society is extremely wealthy. There is no shortage of money. It is just that it is concentrated in the hands of a few very wealthy people.
For a bit of fun, when preparing for this debate, I put this question into an artificial intelligence chat interface:
“Between lower house prices, free tuition, baby boxes, free prescriptions, free bus travel for under 22s, free eye tests, and free social care is a person earning £100,000 a year in Scotland better off than a person living in England, even with Scotland’s different income tax regime?”
Its conclusion was:
“If you’re single, child-free, and healthy, England may offer better net income. But if you have a family, children in education, or elderly relatives needing care”—
which is most of us—
“Scotland’s public services can provide significant non-cash value that may outweigh the tax difference.” [Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Lorna Slater
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My apologies. My system was not updating. I would have voted no.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Lorna Slater
To ask the Scottish Government what its plans are for bringing the requisite regulations—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Lorna Slater
Will the minister give an update on the timescale for that? The issue of heat networks is a fully devolved matter, so why do we need to wait for the UK Government? The development of heat networks was legislated for in 2021, and we are still waiting for the related secondary legislation. Will the minister give us a clear timeline for when the Scottish Government intends to complete that work?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Lorna Slater
Kids cannot learn if they are hungry. That is why the Greens campaigned for universal free school meals for primary 4 and 5 kids and for the expansion to primary 6 and 7 kids whose families receive the Scottish child payment. It is why we brought the next phase of roll-out to secondary 1, 2 and 3 kids who receive the SCP to the budget negotiations. In August, thousands more high school kids in Aberdeen, Glasgow, Fife, Moray, North Ayrshire, South Lanarkshire, Shetland and the Western Isles will now get free school meals. Does the First Minister agree that the programme must be expanded to all council areas as soon as possible to ensure that no kid goes hungry in school?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Lorna Slater
My sincere apologies, Deputy Presiding Officer.
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide further details of its plans for bringing forward the requisite regulations to fully implement the Heat Networks (Scotland) Act 2021, including the special rights and powers that the act foresees for heat network developers. (S6O-04799)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Lorna Slater
Expanding free school meals is one way to build the fairer, greener country that we know Scotland can be. However, children in Scotland will still be forced into poverty thanks to a Labour Government that is balancing the books on the backs of the poorest while the wealthiest grow ever richer.
The United Kingdom Government could have scrapped the cruel two-child benefit cap this week, but it did not. Scotland is tired of mitigating Westminster’s mistakes. Does the First Minister agree that now is the time to demand that Keir Starmer set out exactly what conditions he believes need to be met to trigger an independence referendum for Scotland, so that we can get out of this unequal union?