The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Is the scrutiny by the subject committees of both the officers of Parliament and the Crown entities on any sort of rigorous schedule? Does it happen annually, or is it up to the committees to decide? Is there a framework?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Understood. If, during scrutiny, an officer of Parliament or one of the Crown entities is found not to be performing effectively against their function, how would that issue be identified and resolved, and are there any examples where that has happened?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you for joining us, Dr Wilson. This is fascinating. I will dig into similar points that my colleague the convener asked about.
In Scotland, we have some parallels with your officers in that we also have an ombudsman and an Auditor General. We have a couple of other functions, which I am sure that you implement in New Zealand, but I am interested to hear how. Among our SPCB-supported bodies, we have the Scottish Human Rights Commission, which I think is a fairly common thing for western democracies to have. We also have a couple of different bodies that are responsible for standards in public life, which is about making sure that we, local councillors and so on play by the rules, meet our codes of conduct and that kind of thing. I am curious about how you cover those functions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you, Andrew. Ian, do you have any thoughts on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
We have lost your sound, Ian.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Ian, did you have any thoughts on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
This is my last question, if the convener will indulge me. Ian, in your opening remarks you mentioned the system being at breaking point. Is now a good moment to elaborate on those thoughts?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Yes, you are back.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Lorna Slater
I have two questions, if the convener will allow them, but I will go for the bigger one first. My background is in electromechanical engineering, and certainly when I was an engineering student, we had the same problem then that we have now, in that the field is heavily male dominated. In various evidence sessions, we have heard that we have not made progress because of the parents, that we do not get the kids young enough, or that it is the employers. There is a lot of, “They are not doing enough in this space.” It seems that we, collectively, do not have a handle on why this is a problem, particularly in the UK. Other countries do better in engineering. I know that construction is probably a problem everywhere. Do you guys have any thoughts on why we have a persistent gender imbalance, particularly in construction, engineering and what we are calling green skills, such as those that the Energy Training Academy offers?