The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
That was nice and short. I like short, succinct questions from my colleagues.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Mike Corbett wants to respond as well.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
We will move on to questions from Stuart McMillan on the theme of resources.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
We have spoken a lot about training, and I noticed that the submission from the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland said that there is a
“Lack of political will, technical knowledge and capacity in implementing the right to inclusive education, including insufficient education of all teaching staff”,
which, as we have heard, can include the support assistants that Sylvia Haughney mentioned.
In terms of developing the skills and tackling the increase in the number of pupils with what Peter Bain called mid-range issues, how often should training be taking place, what should it look like and should it be mandatory? We have heard that, sometimes, even though opportunities to access training are provided on in-service training days, people can avoid that training because it is not mandatory.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I would like to challenge you a little bit on that. Earlier, we spoke about the challenges around de-escalating issues in classrooms and the fact that, if teachers were better able to do that, it would be better for pupils’ wellbeing. Therefore, should that training be mandatory, given that it would help the overall delivery of education for everyone, including the teaching staff?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I mean that they could identify the needs and get someone to provide the training to address those needs.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I am sorry, but I need to stop you there. In this role, I have my eye on the clock, and we still need to cover a whole lot of stuff.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Stephanie Callaghan, is there anything that you want to pick up on?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Good morning, and welcome to the sixth meeting in 2024 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. We have apologies from Ruth Maguire and Ben Macpherson. I welcome Stuart McMillan, who joins us as a substitute member of the committee. Our first item of business is to invite Mr McMillan to declare any relevant interests.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Agenda item 2 is our first formal evidence session as part of our additional support for learning inquiry, which starts today, during which we will consider how the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 has been implemented and how it is working in practice, 20 years on.
In our inquiry, we will focus on three themes: first, the implementation of the presumption of mainstreaming; secondly, the impact of Covid-19 on additional support for learning; and, thirdly, the use of the remedies that are set out in the act. Today, we will focus mainly on the first and third themes.
I welcome, in no particular order, Susan Quinn, who is convener of the Educational Institute of Scotland’s education committee; Mike Corbett, who is national official, Scotland, at the NASUWT; Peter Bain, who is executive headteacher at Oban high school and Tiree high school, Tiree primary school and Lismore primary school, and president of School Leaders Scotland; Matthew Cavanagh, who is representing the additional support needs committee of the Scottish Secondary Teachers Association; and Sylvia Haughney, who is education convener at the Glasgow city branch of Unison Scotland. I welcome you all and thank you for the written submissions that you provided ahead of this meeting.
We will move straight to questions from members. Michelle Thomson, who joins us online, will kick off the session.