The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2987 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
Evidence has been submitted to us on the current approach to clarifying information requests. We have heard that, when the time for compliance resets, things can feel somewhat adversarial to those who are requesting the information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
Do you believe that a pause mechanism would lead to a better relationship, between the public authority and the people who are looking for the information?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That would be helpful. The approach just seems a bit out of kilter with the rest of the evidence that we have taken.
I also have questions on proactive publication. The bill proposes to replace the publication schemes with a statutory duty of proactive publication and a code of practice. What opportunities and challenges do you see in implementing that new duty?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
No—that is all.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
My next question is for Kenneth Meechan. The proposal to designate a freedom of information officer in each public authority draws on models from records management and data protection law. How feasible is designating that role for your organisation or other public authorities more widely?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
What impact would professionalising the FOI officer role have on transparency and accountability?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful; thank you.
I have another specific question. In evidence to the committee, there has been considerable support for the repeal of the First Minister’s veto power, but the Law Society has indicated that it does not support that proposal. This is a question for Fiona. Why do you not support the repeal of section 52 of the 2002 act?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
What impact would that have on the resourcing in your team?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
We heard last week that, given the legal requirements around data, most requests for information should be heard; the process should be quite quick; and you should be able to respond. However, are you suggesting that that might not be the case in reality?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
Is there scope for some organisations to be exempt from the requirement to have an information officer?