The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Matthew, can you follow on from that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Might things be delayed because of the pressures on teaching staff and their diary management that arise from having to hold multidisciplinary team meetings? Arranging partnership meetings might be a challenge, as health professionals are equally pressed for time. Susan, how do we square the need to get people trained, which takes them out of contact time, with the pressure to have those planning meetings?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
The argument would be that, if 37 per cent of all pupils have additional support needs, teachers will come across pupils with those needs and, therefore, that training should be part of their compulsory training.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I understand that.
I will bring in Matthew Cavanagh. A number of colleagues have supplementary questions on this issue, but we will see where Matthew takes the discussion.
11:30Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I will bring in Liam Kerr for a supplementary question and then Willie Rennie. Perhaps you can direct your questions to panel members who have not yet responded on this issue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I am sorry, Susan, but Mike Corbett, Peter Bain and Sylvia Haughney want to come in on my original question about the mandatory nature and frequency of training. I will bring in Mike first.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
I thank Peter Bain for those closing remarks, and I thank all the witnesses for their evidence this morning. We could have gone on for much longer, as you could sense.
We plan to take further evidence in the inquiry later this month and in our meetings in early March. We will then produce a report that is based on what we have heard, with recommendations for the Scottish Government.
That concludes the public part of our proceedings today.
12:14 Meeting continued in private until 12:51.Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
That is very convenient. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
Who would like to go first?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Sue Webber
We have spoken about the presumption of mainstreaming. How is that understood by the parent population? How is it implemented in schools, particularly in those with additional support for learning hubs? Here, in Edinburgh, there is currently an issue whereby parents are being told that their children cannot go to schools with enhanced support bases because the council has made a decision to roll out additional support provision to every school. Again, the issue is communication. How is the duty on mainstreaming understood and implemented on the ground so that parents understand what is happening in schools?
My second question is about the flexibility provided by hybrid models, which Peter Bain mentioned. I have heard that such flexibility is not being offered, whereas it should be if we are to allow as many people as possible to take part in education. Will you comment on that?