The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3629 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
This might have been covered on day 1, so I am sorry if it has. We have heard a lot about what happens if an existing councillor or a serving councillor has an offence, but what happens to stop them from standing in the first place? That would be out of your hands, would it not?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
—and that is something that my party cannot support.
On 17 July 2024, the shadow transport secretary, Helen Whately, described nationalisation as
“a move that can only be based in ideology”,
and said—[Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
She said that
“Nationalising well-run operators won’t bring fares down or make services more reliable”.
Furthermore, Rail Partners, which represents the interests of private sector train and freight operators, has argued that
“full nationalisation is a political not a practical solution, which will increase costs over time”.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
The Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill would remove the presumption in favour of franchised passenger railway services being provided by the private sector and would instead allow train operations to be provided by a public sector company when existing franchise contracts end.
Clause 1 would prohibit the Secretary of State for Transport or the Scottish ministers from extending existing rail franchises or entering into new franchise agreements, apart from in specific limited circumstances. It would also remove the presumption in favour of franchised railway passenger services being provided by a private operator. Instead, these will be provided by a public sector company, under a public sector contract.
Clause 2 would place a duty on the relevant franchising authority to provide or secure passenger rail services by giving a direct award to a public sector company. The secretary of state would also have the power to extend existing franchises or to agree new franchises with the same private sector operator as currently operates the service.
Clause 3 would give the secretary of state the regulation-making powers to make consequential amendments, including to primary legislation.
Ultimately, the aim of the bill is to bring all rail franchises into public hands—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
My party believes that the bill would have a detrimental effect on Scottish travellers who rely on key cross-border services such as Avanti West Coast. It would also limit competition. Cut-price rail providers such as Lumo, which planned, over the summer, to provide an increased east coast mainline service from Edinburgh Waverley to London King’s Cross, and which also hopes to expand through to the west in Glasgow, could be prevented from providing such a service once the franchise ends.
Finally, and more importantly, the legislation would tie the hands of Scottish ministers and compel them to keep ScotRail and the Caledonian sleeper in public ownership.
17:02Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
In Scotland, classroom standards are plummeting and violence is rising. Teacher numbers are declining, secure full-time posts are scarce, and cuts to school hours and assistant numbers are at risk. Currie community high school parent council is writing to the City of Edinburgh Council to express its deep concern regarding the proposed cuts to additional support needs services in our education community. It states that the cuts could significantly affect the quality of education and support for those students who rely on ASN services and wider learners.
Foreign aid is reserved and public cash should be spent at home rather than abroad. Does the cabinet secretary agree that the Scottish Government should be prioritising the education of Scotland’s young people first?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 31 October 2024
Sue Webber
To ask the Scottish Government whether the £12.5 million of funding that it plans to provide for education in Malawi, Rwanda and Zambia was set out in the budget for 2024-25. (S6O-03872)
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Sue Webber
Bill Kidd. I am sorry.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Sue Webber
When, and how frequently, does the Government use its powers of direction to the inspectorate right now? We have had some evidence on that. The cabinet secretary referred to impartiality. Some people have suggested that the inspectorate should report to Parliament rather than to ministers. Does the cabinet secretary envisage similar levels of direction under the new arrangements?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Sue Webber
Pam Duncan-Glancy, over to you.