The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3625 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
Section 10 of the bill would amend section 43 of the 2002 act, which sets out the general functions of the Scottish Information Commissioner. You consider it necessary to have a statutory power to require individuals, rather than just the public authority, to provide information when it is necessary for the commissioner to perform their statutory functions. Is that correct?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
Indeed, the Scottish Government indicated last week that there might be issues with legislative competence, including in relation to the procurator fiscal and the Lord Advocate.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
On section 12 of the bill, you have indicated in the policy memorandum that the use of enforcement notices to require compliance with the codes of practice should be seen as a “last resort”. The Scottish Government has indicated to us that it has concerns that making the codes of practice enforceable would give them the status of law. Why do you consider it important that a practice recommendation can ultimately be enforced?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
We heard some examples from the minister last week—including, I think, in relation to national security—but there are other mechanisms.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
My questions are on enforcement and the Scottish Information Commissioner, because a number of sections of the bill would make technical updates to enforcement powers. Section 9 would bring in a new exemption for information that is provided to the Scottish Information Commissioner during the investigation of appeals process. Why is that necessary?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
You were here last week. We have heard that the Scottish Government believes that, as drafted, the exemption is not limited to FOI requests made to the commissioner in respect of information held by him. The Government’s view is that, under the bill, once information was provided to the commissioner, it would become exempt even if it would not previously have benefited from an exemption. How do you respond to the concerns that that could allow the original authority to rely on that exemption and withhold the same information in response to other requests?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
If it is your intention that the exemption should apply only to the commissioner, should the provision be amended to make that clearer?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
We have received correspondence from the commissioner on the specific example that you referred to, and you are correct in saying that the matter has been widely covered in the press this week.
Section 13 of the bill deals with the First Minister’s veto power. Why do you believe that the veto should not be retained, even in a more limited form, as suggested by the Scottish Government? The Scottish Government stated last week that it wished power to be retained. Your position is different.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, and the issue relates to optics, trust and respect. I understand that.
In relation to section 14, the Information Commissioner explained to the committee that late compliance with decision notices has resulted in unnecessary expenditure for his office. If a public authority ultimately complied with the substantive requirements of a decision notice, even if it was late, what practical benefit would pursuing enforcement through the courts for late compliance deliver?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Sue Webber
Following an unannounced HIS inspection in June 2025, NHS Lothian’s maternity service has been escalated to level 3, requiring Government oversight after failing to meet 26 basic standards of care. Only two health board maternity services have been inspected. Will the cabinet secretary accept that now is the time for a nationwide review into our maternity services?