The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3795 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Sue Webber
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I have a spreadsheet on my computer with a waiting list of members of the public who are desperate to get into the gallery today. The gallery does not appear to be particularly full at the moment, given how many people are waiting to get into proceedings.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Sue Webber
I agree with Ruth Maguire that it is vital that only adults who are capable of understanding the implications of their decision are able to apply for a GRC. Does she agree that that highlights that any application for a GRC should be made only by people who are aged 18 or over?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Sue Webber
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Sue Webber
Does Sarah Boyack agree that the Scottish Government has failed to specify in detail the support and information that would be available to applicants under the bill? Given that the pool of people who are able to apply for GRCs is being widened, does she think that even more support and information should be provided than is currently set out in the bill?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Sue Webber
As Ms Boyack has just stated, amendment 23 is the lead amendment in this group, with amendments 20 and 21 being consequential to it. Amendment 23 would add a provision requiring the Scottish ministers to
“take steps to ensure that individuals who are considering making an application for a gender recognition certificate ... have access to”
appropriate
“support and information.”
The decision to apply for such a certificate is a significant one for anyone to take, and it is absolutely right that they should be supported with all the appropriate information. The amendments are especially important given that the Scottish Government is opening up the process to a wider cohort of applicants. Such an expansion of the process will mean that the individuals involved in the application process risk going in blind if they are not adequately supported.
Indeed, it is regrettable that the Scottish Government is taking away some of the safeguards that exist under current law, as I believe that they would help to provide the support that applicants for a gender recognition certificate need, while also keeping in place the safeguards that protect vulnerable women and girls.
I do not think that these amendments adequately address my concerns about the removal of other safeguards in the bill, but they represent an improvement on the current provisions. I will therefore be supporting them.
19:30Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Sue Webber
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the open letter signed by over 500 businesses asking for the deposit return scheme to be delayed beyond next summer. (S6O-01697)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Sue Webber
The smaller drinks producers are especially worried. Earlier this week, I met Own Label Company Scotland Ltd, which is based in Edinburgh and, incidentally, produces whisky for the Parliament. The company wants the deposit return scheme to succeed but faces costs and administration that threaten its survival.
With only nine months until the supposed launch, small firms are still awaiting key information. Furthermore, the Scottish Government’s review team found that a
“fully functioning and compliant DRS cannot be in operation for the revised August 2023 schedule.”
Does the minister not see that, despite her stating that no change in the launch date is planned, it makes sense to let the large firms, which can manage the launch first, resolve the problems and then launch for smaller firms? Should August 2023 be the timeline to which businesses are working?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Sue Webber
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Sue Webber
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Sue Webber
Will the member take an intervention?