Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 26 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3795 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Business Motion

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Sue Webber

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I have a spreadsheet on my computer with a waiting list of members of the public who are desperate to get into the gallery today. The gallery does not appear to be particularly full at the moment, given how many people are waiting to get into proceedings.

Meeting of the Parliament

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Sue Webber

I agree with Ruth Maguire that it is vital that only adults who are capable of understanding the implications of their decision are able to apply for a GRC. Does she agree that that highlights that any application for a GRC should be made only by people who are aged 18 or over?

Meeting of the Parliament

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Sue Webber

Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?

Meeting of the Parliament

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Sue Webber

Does Sarah Boyack agree that the Scottish Government has failed to specify in detail the support and information that would be available to applicants under the bill? Given that the pool of people who are able to apply for GRCs is being widened, does she think that even more support and information should be provided than is currently set out in the bill?

Meeting of the Parliament

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Sue Webber

As Ms Boyack has just stated, amendment 23 is the lead amendment in this group, with amendments 20 and 21 being consequential to it. Amendment 23 would add a provision requiring the Scottish ministers to

“take steps to ensure that individuals who are considering making an application for a gender recognition certificate ... have access to”

appropriate

“support and information.”

The decision to apply for such a certificate is a significant one for anyone to take, and it is absolutely right that they should be supported with all the appropriate information. The amendments are especially important given that the Scottish Government is opening up the process to a wider cohort of applicants. Such an expansion of the process will mean that the individuals involved in the application process risk going in blind if they are not adequately supported.

Indeed, it is regrettable that the Scottish Government is taking away some of the safeguards that exist under current law, as I believe that they would help to provide the support that applicants for a gender recognition certificate need, while also keeping in place the safeguards that protect vulnerable women and girls.

I do not think that these amendments adequately address my concerns about the removal of other safeguards in the bill, but they represent an improvement on the current provisions. I will therefore be supporting them.

19:30  

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Sue Webber

To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the open letter signed by over 500 businesses asking for the deposit return scheme to be delayed beyond next summer. (S6O-01697)

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Sue Webber

The smaller drinks producers are especially worried. Earlier this week, I met Own Label Company Scotland Ltd, which is based in Edinburgh and, incidentally, produces whisky for the Parliament. The company wants the deposit return scheme to succeed but faces costs and administration that threaten its survival.

With only nine months until the supposed launch, small firms are still awaiting key information. Furthermore, the Scottish Government’s review team found that a

“fully functioning and compliant DRS cannot be in operation for the revised August 2023 schedule.”

Does the minister not see that, despite her stating that no change in the launch date is planned, it makes sense to let the large firms, which can manage the launch first, resolve the problems and then launch for smaller firms? Should August 2023 be the timeline to which businesses are working?

Meeting of the Parliament

Health Inequalities (Report)

Meeting date: 14 December 2022

Sue Webber

Will the member give way?

Meeting of the Parliament

Health Inequalities (Report)

Meeting date: 14 December 2022

Sue Webber

Will the member take an intervention?

Meeting of the Parliament

Health Inequalities (Report)

Meeting date: 14 December 2022

Sue Webber

Will the member take an intervention?