The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
I have two questions: one about the reimbursement process and one on service commissioning for the future. We will deal with the reimbursement element first. Mr Hornby has spoken about it being a case-by-case process. We have heard from many of the witnesses about how complicated the issue of what we call wraparound costs is—we already know that the surgery is complicated, that no two cases are the same and that unexpected costs occur.
The administration of the reimbursement scheme sounds like it might be quite complex. At the same time, the payment will not be made until everything is concluded, but women will want to be reimbursed as quickly as possible. What extra resources has NSS put in to administer the scheme successfully to tie it all in for the women at the end of a traumatic period of their lives?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
NHS National Services Scotland has expressed concern that the bill might set a precedent for other groups in a similar position. What have you and your team learned from the experience to ensure that we will not have to consider similar provision for other procedures in the future?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
I have a quick question for Dr Jamieson. What is the time period between the first and second consultations? That will have a big impact when you are planning your service.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for coming along, cabinet secretary. You mentioned the cross-party support for the bill, but given that the NHS has always had the ability to refer patients for services between Scotland and England, can you see any reasons why you might not need to establish the reimbursement scheme?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Our papers say that, when we called for views on the bill from the health boards, we received responses only from NHS Highland and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. That is an indicator that the health boards are perhaps not aware of what is going on despite the publicity that the matter has had. What work is under way to publicise the service to the various NHS boards throughout Scotland? What is the timeline for them to receive guidance on the referral routes to make the process as clear as possible for women who will access the service via their local health boards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for those answers. However, going back to what Jackie Baillie said earlier on and the correspondence that we received last night, that trust and confidence are still not there. That binary choice, and the one route into referral via Glasgow, will be an issue.
Although the choice of surgeon is significant, another factor is that, for whatever reason, the Glasgow service has a bad reputation among mesh survivors. What, specifically, are we doing to give women the confidence to come into the service, knowing that they will get a good outcome, wherever it might be, for whatever treatment and whatever the approach might be needed at the other end?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you; that answers my specific question.
Can you clarify whether all women will still have to refer in via NHS GGC, whether the commissioned service be the Glasgow mesh service, the site in NHS England, the potential site at Spire Healthcare, or overseas? With regard to the hierarchy—that word might not be correct but you will understand it—is there a preferred route? If the women do not want to go to Glasgow, will we encourage them to take up the service in NHS England because it is an NHS service and the wraparound care might be more definable there, or are those choices patient driven? The matter is complicated.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
You have spoken at length, and we have heard much, about the complexity of the wraparound care that the women need. Are you satisfied that the bill and the provision for procurement of services from the private sector will not undermine the NHS in any way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for that answer. We know that the first point of call is often with the woman and her GP, but there are many GPs across the country. What wider publicity and training are being provided about the national mesh service, and particularly about the GPs linking into it and understanding the complications that arise from the surgery, so that they can refer women quickly and effectively into the service?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Is that the realistic medicine that you referred to earlier in the discussion today?