The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3728 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
Okay. Thank you, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
The bill as drafted does not require individuals to be informed of those risks before making their decisions. It merely states that the registered medical practitioner who is performing the assessment under section 6 of the bill must advise and explain to the terminally ill adult matters relating to their diagnosis and prognosis and the available treatment and care options, as well as clearly explaining that taking those substances will end their life. After all, that is why they are there.
The omission undermines one of the core principles that the Parliament should uphold, which is informed consent. My amendment would correct that by requiring the co-ordinating medical practitioner to inform the adult of any potential side effects or complications, including the risk of pain, as I have already said, and to be satisfied that the adult has understood them. That would ensure that people are given not simply a choice, but an honest choice. It is not about endorsing assisted suicide or not; it is about recognising the reality that, if the Parliament passes the bill, we have a duty to minimise harm and prevent any unnecessary suffering. Even those who support the principle of assisted suicide should want the public to know what they are choosing—not the idealised version, but the reality as it has played out elsewhere.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I have one amendment in the group, which is amendment 158.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I am not aware of the specifics that you have raised, Mr FitzPatrick, but why not put it into the bill? We are doing something that is really challenging for many people around the table, and the bill might pass at stage 3. I want every safeguard in place, and I want full consent to be given by anyone who considers ending their life. We must ensure that that is the case, and it is our obligation to do that.
If the bill passes, we cannot allow people to walk into the process blind. Amendment 158 is about damage limitation. It is completely about ensuring that 100 per cent informed consent is given. It is a safeguard against ignorance and a reminder that, even when we legislate for death, the Parliament still bears responsibility for life.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
“Give the best answer the first time around”—we will take that out of that reponse.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
Okay. Does anyone else want to comment?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
If the proposed amendment to the general entitlement does not alter the position of disclosure under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, how might it still help to shift organisational culture or public perception around transparency?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
I am struggling to hear you, Alex. You are going in and out. I will ask Juliet Swann that question, which I hope you can pick up.
Public authorities say that they already operate with that presumption of disclosure and are open and transparent. Why, then, do users of FOISA often feel that exemptions are used as a default in order to withhold information?
10:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
You do not think that they would be viewed as delaying tactics or with suspicion by the requester.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
Juliet Swann, would the proposed pause improve the experience of users of the 2002 act and strengthen trust in the system?