The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3940 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
I press amendment 67.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
That was much clearer—thank you so much, Presiding Officer.
Once again, all the amendments in the group have been lodged by me. As I laid out at stage 2, we should be guided by the fact that the public expects far more from MSPs, and we should be held to higher standards than those we represent.
Being a member of this Parliament is a privilege, not an entitlement. I believe that, regardless of the severity of the crime, any MSP who is convicted of an offence should be removed automatically, bypassing the need for a recall petition or by-election. As we saw with the case of Margaret Ferrier—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
I find it slightly ironic that two regional MSPs are supporting my amendments but the Government minister who was elected in a constituency is not. I push back on the member who introduced the bill, who, in my opinion, did a fair bit of heavy lifting in that section.
We have to figure out whether the public will understand the process. If we want to involve the electorate, the process must be simple and understandable. We should avoid creating a complex and unwieldy process that, quite frankly, might push the electorate away from engaging whole-heartedly in it.
I press amendment 38.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
Yes, I will give way to Jeremy Balfour.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
I am not going to give way to Mr Cole-Hamilton.
As we have heard several times, a 10-day sanction can be given by Parliament and there is no appeal process for that. We are looking for parity in appeals, which we hear about time and time again. What opportunity has there been to make the bill what it was originally intended to be and what it is for?
On the standards review, the minister’s comments made me ponder whether the Government may be reconsidering its support for the bill. Maybe we will get into that a bit more at some point in the afternoon.
I say to Mr Dey that I accept that there is no definition of “community sentence” in the Scottish legislation, but the other members and parties in the chamber seem to be rather soft-touch on justice, and to want to allow MSPs who have been found guilty and sentenced to either a custodial sentence or a community sentence to remain representing the public. I do not believe that the public would accept that, so, on that premise, I will press amendment 1, and I intend to move my other amendments in the group.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
I think that the public expect us to attend and participate in Parliament. I accept the challenges with the definition of attendance and perhaps with that of participation.
I press amendment 64.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
The sound was all over the place there, Presiding Officer. It was coming in and out, and I did not quite hear everything. Perhaps whoever is working the sound can—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
—unless I was driving at 100mph along the Cowgate at 7 am. We know that none of us should be doing that. [Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
Thank you, Mr Hoy. As MSPs, we have very challenging and complex diaries to manage and we cannot be in every single proceeding in every single committee. That is the whole point of having parliamentary and party groups—[Interruption.] Are members okay with that?
I recognise that non-attendance has clearly garnered some concern among members, but I raise the fact that such a provision already exists at local government level, and there have been a number of instances in which disgraced members have been able to continue to draw a salary without doing any work for the constituents who elected them. I invite members to work with me to find a solution that would bring non-attendance back into the bill.
I move amendment 64.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Sue Webber
Will the member take an intervention?