The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
There will be a division.
For
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Webber, Sue (Lothian) (Con)
Against
Callaghan, Stephanie (Uddingston and Bellshill) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Maguire, Ruth (Cunninghame South) (SNP)
Thomson, Michelle (Falkirk East) (SNP)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2024 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. The first and only item on our agenda this morning is day 1 of consideration of the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill at stage 2.
I welcome the Minister for Children, Young People and Keeping the Promise and her supporting officials to our meeting. I note that the officials who are seated at the table are here to support the minister but are unable to speak in the debates on the various amendments. Members should therefore direct all their comments or questions for the Scottish Government directly to the minister.
Before we begin in earnest, I will briefly explain the procedure that we will follow for everyone who is watching and perhaps for some in the room. The amendments that have been lodged to the bill have been grouped together and there will be one debate on each group of amendments. I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in each group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all the other amendments in the group. I will then call any other members who have lodged amendments in the group. Members who have not lodged amendments in the group but wish to speak should catch my attention. If Ms Don has not already spoken on the group, I will then invite her to contribute to the debate. The debate on the group will be concluded by my inviting the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up. Members should have this information on a sheet of paper as well.
Following the debate on each group, I will check whether the member who moved the first amendment in the group wishes to press it to a vote or to withdraw it. If they wish to press ahead, I will put the question on that amendment. If a member wishes to withdraw their amendment after it has been moved, they must seek the agreement of other members to do so. If any member who is present objects, the committee will immediately move to a vote on the amendment. I hope that you are all keeping up. If a member does not want to move their amendment when called, they should say, “Not moved.” Please note that any other member who is present may move such an amendment. If no one moves it, I will immediately call the next amendment on the marshalled list.
I remind everyone that only committee members—not substitute members, Mr Whitfield—are allowed to vote. Voting in any division is by show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands clearly raised until the clerk has recorded the vote.
The committee is required to indicate formally that it has considered and agreed each section of the bill, so I will put a question on each section at the appropriate point.
Now that we have covered the housekeeping matters, we can start the substantive business.
Before section 1
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
The next group of amendments is on “Children’s hearings system: rights and welfare issues for the child”. Amendment 165, in the name of Martin Whitfield, is grouped with amendments 167, 166, 170, 171, 119 to 121, 172, 177 and 182.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
You are clearly not allowed to take much of a breath, minister. [Laughter.]
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
There will be a division.
For
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Webber, Sue (Lothian) (Con)
Against
Callaghan, Stephanie (Uddingston and Bellshill) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Maguire, Ruth (Cunninghame South) (SNP)
Thomson, Michelle (Falkirk East) (SNP)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
The next group of amendments is on emergency placement in secure accommodation. Amendment 1, in the name of the minister, is the only amendment in the group.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
I am not sure whether you want to respond further—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
The question is, that amendment 172 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 172 disagreed to.
Section 2 agreed to.
Section 3—Compulsory supervision orders: prohibitions
Amendments 4 and 5 not moved.
Section 3 agreed to.
After section 3
Amendment 173 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sue Webber
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 173 disagreed to.
Amendment 6 not moved.
Section 4—Compulsory supervision orders: movement restriction conditions