Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2987 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

I was just about to say that that would feed into the rhetoric that an adversarial approach is taken to requests for information.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

That is a helpful example. Is the public sector ready to implement that proactive duty to publish? What support might it need?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

That is helpful.

Fiona, do you want to respond to those questions?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

That is the very point, Dr Gulhane. When anyone else undergoes a consultation with a medical professional, they are given the full facts. Right now, my other half is having eye surgery, and he was told the full risks and benefits of the operation so that he could weigh up the choices. Such information is given in any interaction with a medical professional, and I expect it to be given in this instance as well. If amendment 158 does not pass today and Mr McArthur seeks to work with me, I will, of course, work with him.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I will not, Mr FitzPatrick, because I am conscious of the time. I promised the clerks that I would speak for only four to five minutes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I am aware of medical professionals who will tell you that the medications that you have listed can induce vomiting and all sorts of concerning side effects. Any medication can do that, depending on the individual. The risk could be one in 10, one in 100, one in 1,000 or one in 100,000, but there are risks for anyone who is taking medicine of any kind. Frankly, Ms Harper, you should be aware of that.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

Oh, my goodness. The convener used my Sunday name. [Laughter.] I assure the committee that I have just one amendment in the group.

I thank Mr McArthur for referring to my amendment 158 following some of the remarks about how patients must have as much information as possible and how the nature of the options and their implications must be provided to them. My amendment 158 would strengthen the safeguards by ensuring that applicants are fully informed about the potential side effects and risks, including the pain that is associated with the substances that would be used in assisted dying. As we have heard, the period of reflection will begin when the person makes their first declaration, and the assessment that is carried out by the co-ordinating registered medical practitioner is to take place as soon as is reasonably practical after the first declaration is made. At that point, they must inform the person of various matters. My amendment would add specifics to the various matters that are listed in the bill.

I believe that my amendment addresses a serious moral and medical flaw, which is the bill’s presumption that the substances that are used in assisted suicide will always deliver a swift and painless death—that is not the case. Everyone is different, and the way in which they interact with medication will be individual. The bill’s assumption is not supported by evidence. Experience from other countries shows that such substances can have severe side effects. In places where assisted suicide is legal, there have been reports of vomiting, choking and fluid in the lungs—

Would Ms Harper like to intervene?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

Okay. Thank you, convener.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

The bill as drafted does not require individuals to be informed of those risks before making their decisions. It merely states that the registered medical practitioner who is performing the assessment under section 6 of the bill must advise and explain to the terminally ill adult matters relating to their diagnosis and prognosis and the available treatment and care options, as well as clearly explaining that taking those substances will end their life. After all, that is why they are there.

The omission undermines one of the core principles that the Parliament should uphold, which is informed consent. My amendment would correct that by requiring the co-ordinating medical practitioner to inform the adult of any potential side effects or complications, including the risk of pain, as I have already said, and to be satisfied that the adult has understood them. That would ensure that people are given not simply a choice, but an honest choice. It is not about endorsing assisted suicide or not; it is about recognising the reality that, if the Parliament passes the bill, we have a duty to minimise harm and prevent any unnecessary suffering. Even those who support the principle of assisted suicide should want the public to know what they are choosing—not the idealised version, but the reality as it has played out elsewhere.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I have one amendment in the group, which is amendment 158.