The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2987 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
I was just about to say that that would feed into the rhetoric that an adversarial approach is taken to requests for information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is a helpful example. Is the public sector ready to implement that proactive duty to publish? What support might it need?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful.
Fiona, do you want to respond to those questions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is the very point, Dr Gulhane. When anyone else undergoes a consultation with a medical professional, they are given the full facts. Right now, my other half is having eye surgery, and he was told the full risks and benefits of the operation so that he could weigh up the choices. Such information is given in any interaction with a medical professional, and I expect it to be given in this instance as well. If amendment 158 does not pass today and Mr McArthur seeks to work with me, I will, of course, work with him.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I will not, Mr FitzPatrick, because I am conscious of the time. I promised the clerks that I would speak for only four to five minutes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I am aware of medical professionals who will tell you that the medications that you have listed can induce vomiting and all sorts of concerning side effects. Any medication can do that, depending on the individual. The risk could be one in 10, one in 100, one in 1,000 or one in 100,000, but there are risks for anyone who is taking medicine of any kind. Frankly, Ms Harper, you should be aware of that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
Oh, my goodness. The convener used my Sunday name. [Laughter.] I assure the committee that I have just one amendment in the group.
I thank Mr McArthur for referring to my amendment 158 following some of the remarks about how patients must have as much information as possible and how the nature of the options and their implications must be provided to them. My amendment 158 would strengthen the safeguards by ensuring that applicants are fully informed about the potential side effects and risks, including the pain that is associated with the substances that would be used in assisted dying. As we have heard, the period of reflection will begin when the person makes their first declaration, and the assessment that is carried out by the co-ordinating registered medical practitioner is to take place as soon as is reasonably practical after the first declaration is made. At that point, they must inform the person of various matters. My amendment would add specifics to the various matters that are listed in the bill.
I believe that my amendment addresses a serious moral and medical flaw, which is the bill’s presumption that the substances that are used in assisted suicide will always deliver a swift and painless death—that is not the case. Everyone is different, and the way in which they interact with medication will be individual. The bill’s assumption is not supported by evidence. Experience from other countries shows that such substances can have severe side effects. In places where assisted suicide is legal, there have been reports of vomiting, choking and fluid in the lungs—
Would Ms Harper like to intervene?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
Okay. Thank you, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
The bill as drafted does not require individuals to be informed of those risks before making their decisions. It merely states that the registered medical practitioner who is performing the assessment under section 6 of the bill must advise and explain to the terminally ill adult matters relating to their diagnosis and prognosis and the available treatment and care options, as well as clearly explaining that taking those substances will end their life. After all, that is why they are there.
The omission undermines one of the core principles that the Parliament should uphold, which is informed consent. My amendment would correct that by requiring the co-ordinating medical practitioner to inform the adult of any potential side effects or complications, including the risk of pain, as I have already said, and to be satisfied that the adult has understood them. That would ensure that people are given not simply a choice, but an honest choice. It is not about endorsing assisted suicide or not; it is about recognising the reality that, if the Parliament passes the bill, we have a duty to minimise harm and prevent any unnecessary suffering. Even those who support the principle of assisted suicide should want the public to know what they are choosing—not the idealised version, but the reality as it has played out elsewhere.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I have one amendment in the group, which is amendment 158.