Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 30 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2357 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 18 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

Good morning. I remind those in the room and those watching of my declaration of interests.

I do not intend to speak for too long on this group, because Miles Briggs has introduced it exceptionally well. It is about ensuring the best for individual children for whom family group decision making can make a transformative change. I have lodged amendment 208A, which seeks to add to amendment 208, on consideration of whether family group decision making is offered. The extension would require the reporter to consider that in appropriate cases.

Amendment 210A seeks to add specificity to the reports that would be produced under amendment 210, in the name of Miles Briggs, which I support.

We have an opportunity here to bring into the bill something that should have been there from the outset. Since the Promise was originally made, family group decision making has been seen as a way of ensuring the best environment in which to not only discuss challenges and promises, but find solutions.

Like Miles Briggs, I welcome the Scottish Government’s move to see where we are on that, but I think that it will be a crucial, important and timely intervention in the bill’s progress, which will assist. I will leave it at that.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

I have a follow-on question. I am happy for you to answer, Iain, if you can. What is the process for a voter to come off a continuing postal vote—this is a difficult question—and how well understood is that process by the voter?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

The second item on our agenda is consideration of two affirmative Scottish statutory instruments relating to access to the online absent voter application for voters in the Scottish parliamentary and local authority elections. We have an opportunity to take evidence from the Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans before we consider whether to recommend to the Parliament that the SSIs be approved.

I welcome to the meeting Graeme Dey, the Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans; Iain Hockenhull, the head of the elections team in the Scottish Government; and Lorraine Walkinshaw, a solicitor in the Scottish Government.

Before we turn to questions from members, do you wish to make any introductory comments, minister?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

The next item on the agenda is a debate on motion S6M-20589. As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during the debate on the motion. I invite the minister to move the motion.

Motion moved,

That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Absent Voting (Miscellaneous Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2026 [draft] be approved.—[Graeme Dey]

Motion agreed to.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

I will kick off with a simple question. I hope that we all know the answer to it, but the answer needs to be known. This will in no way affect the election that is coming up in May, because it will all take place—go live, as you have described it—after the election, so voters need do nothing differently in the approach to the current election. Is that correct?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

Excellent. Thank you.

We already have some experience of Scottish voters using OAVA, following the general election last year. Do you have any data or insights yet on how well that is working?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

In the future, the process of informing you that you will drop off will work as it always has done. There are examples where it has not worked, but there are far more examples of where it has worked.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

That is great.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

The biggest challenge—I hope that even “challenge” is too strong a word—relates to the reach-out to those voters who are coming off the system, of whom there may be an increase in numbers. Are you satisfied that that is at the lower end, within the scope of expenditure, and that we will not have a problem with people coming back and saying, “We just don’t have the resource to reach out to the X number of voters who have come off?”

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Martin Whitfield

That is helpful. Again, I do not wish to burden a future committee that will potentially sit in this room, but, if you see a challenge coming, it would be good to know that.

My final question relates to the fact that this is all online. What is the paper equivalent for those of our constituents who simply dislike using online methods, minister?