Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1811 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Just to help—or to try to help but, no doubt, to muddy the waters—I note that, with regard to the vehicle by which an individual moves from being on a list to being an MSP, one of the requirements is that the political party under which their name appears on the list certifies that. That does not happen post-election but is one of the conditions of their coming in. Emma Roddick is referencing the challenge whereby the way that the bill would operate would potentially circumvent that process without removing the need for the party to provide the certification. The previous panel of witnesses suggested that the party should be forced to do it. The challenge that you have just raised, Sarah, is what would happen if the party does not want to do that. That is the element that we are looking at.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Another issue is expenditure by political parties in relation to the petition, which is, of course, not an election. What are the commission’s thoughts on deadlines and timelines in that respect? How do we tie that into reporting? What are the potential risks that we have to look at?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

We can discuss that later.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I have a follow-up question that I am going to push you on. What is in the public domain might or might not be the same as what we hold in private, but it could become part of the discussion that takes place in the chamber, which is a meeting in public. Do we need to be concerned about that? I am comparing that with the data that we might process, hold and be aware of, which we would deal with under a system that has been thought through. What is the challenge around those two points?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

It will be case by case, but it will be sitting on a transparent process of what we have to do in terms of data protection and other things. That is helpful.

Does Graham Simpson have any questions on this point?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I thank the witnesses for an interesting session. As always, I ask you to feel free to contact the committee if something comes to mind after the meeting. I will reciprocate and say that we might well come back to you. Thank you for your attendance today.

I now move the committee into private session.

11:04 Meeting continued in private until 11:26.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am sure that we will get to the point of considering how a number of local authority areas might come together and interact. Do you see costs and registration being a particular challenge if a number of local authority areas, and various people, were to be responsible for a petition and its next steps, if the proposals were to go that far?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you, Peter. Robert Nicol, may I come to you?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I suppose that the purpose of my question is to find out whether that individual needs support, in primary legislation, to make those decisions. In some areas, one could see there being conflicting views on such decisions. Perhaps having very open, strong guidance—even just on a minimum number of sites—would reinforce and support those decisions without opening the petition officer up to criticism.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

From an administrative point of view, the mechanics suggest limiting it, but—I do not want to use the word “automation”—electronification of electoral registration may make it easier. Would it be reviewed at that stage?