The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
You have specified that it would be an additional mechanism by which designation could happen, but do you also see it as an angel on the shoulder of the Government to ensure that it accelerates its own role in designation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Katy. As the convener, I will grab the opportunity to kick off. You have already discussed the recommendations that came out of session 5, and you have talked about how all those who have held the Information Commissioner role have indicated shortcomings that they have identified. On a personal level, are you a bit disappointed that a member’s bill has been required to deal with the reform?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We are at the tail end of the parliamentary session. You have pointed out some of the issues at evidence sessions that you have attended, but do you want to put on the record formally your concerns about the time that is left in the parliamentary session for your bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am glad to hear that. My final question is over the Scottish Government’s concern about the specific commencement of the act, because of the need for everyone to understand what might happen with regard to the new offence. Have you got any views about an extension to the commencement, or are you open to having discussions about the matter before stage 2?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 23rd meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Emma Roddick, and I welcome Rona Mackay, who is attending as her substitute.
Agenda items 4 and 5 relate to consideration of the recommendations of the Scottish Parliament gender-sensitive audit and to guidance on the code of conduct. Under agenda item 1, do we agree to consider items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 2 is an evidence-taking session on the Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Katy Clark, the member in charge of the bill. She is supported today by Carole Ewart, the director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information in Scotland. Thank you both for joining us. I will hand over to you, Katy, to make some opening remarks.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Your view is that an email address should be sufficient and it does not need to be an email address and postal address—is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That, in essence, would also be your thesis in response to the point that new designations would cost money. When there is a new designation, much of the work of the Information Commissioner will already have been done, unless the individual, authority or entity wants to spend a fortune. Designation will be presented as a step, and a newly designated body should not fear it, because, if it is a well-run organisation, it can comply easily.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I apologise for interrupting you, Carole. I am conscious of the time, because we have a lot to get through. The session is for the member. A substantial amount of what you have talked about has been submitted in evidence, so we have heard it. I am conscious that we want to hear from the member in charge of the bill rather than consider evidence that we have already heard, because, if the bill progresses, we must also establish the amount of room that we have to make changes. However, thank you for that contribution.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sorry, Ruth. I did not mean to cut across you.