The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1808 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Again, on the timings of the inquiries, you tended to have them in two sessions, in the daytime and in the evening, which is sensible, but again, the day of the week that they were held was inconvenient for a number of people. It is easy to find reasons why something is not working, but from looking at the way in which the inquiries are conducted and the expectations on individuals who spoke at the inquiries that I was aware of, I know that they were not professional witnesses and they were not sure what to expect. The good thing was that, at the end of it, a lot of them were amazed at how nice the experience had been and how it was not adversarial.
However, there is a perception about the word “inquiry” across Scotland that is perhaps not the most positive, and people were extremely concerned about interacting with an inquiry. Again, I wonder whether the system that you described that you would like to move to would answer the challenges that came out of some inquiries and the subsequent inquiries that had to happen before they become challenges.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. That is the document that we are looking at. I absolutely accept that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Would you welcome that? Would you like to consider that?
A consultation is going on, so, to be fair, perhaps that question is best left until after the consultation is finished.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
You are presented with a jigsaw without a reference picture; I fully appreciate that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes—I see the sense in it now.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Will those lessons learned be a public document?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. My next question is a mischievous one: is it the map or the description that is the final arbiter of the new constituencies and regions? Which is the governing part—your maps or the written descriptions in your paper that sit with the Government?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is an open invite to you for the right moment.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It would go further than that, in the sense that there would be parity up to the trigger of the event that would lead to a recall petition. Parity commences when a member takes the oath. There would be parity up to the point at which a member is shown—if proved through the process and after appeals—to be unfit to hold the office. Is the Scottish Government comfortable with that being the edge of parity and that the recall process could reflect the different ways that people come here before taking the oath?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does the Scottish Government not having a view also extend—we are getting to the unknown unknowns—to views or opinions in our stage 1 report if we suggest changes? Is the Government in any way concerned that there might be different journeys for different MSPs after a recall has been triggered?