The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2081 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am sorry, Sue, but I think that Ruth Maguire has a little follow-up question for Kenneth Meechan.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Welcome back. I welcome our second panel of witnesses. Chris Milne is former chair of the Scottish higher education information practitioners group, and Fiona Stuart, who joins us online, is a member of the Law Society of Scotland’s privacy sub-committee. We will move straight to questions, if that is all right.
Fiona Stuart, the policy memorandum talks about the bill’s aims
“to improve transparency in Scotland by strengthening existing measures in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002”,
and to deliver recommendations that came, some time ago, from the Parliament in the previous session. How timely are those reforms now?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Chris Milne, is the bill timely?
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Fiona. You have provided the perfect contents page for our questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. You got away lightly there, Emma—well done. We look forward to the Law Society’s response.
Chris, I go back to the question for clarification on the change of definition and the presumption. Would you and those you represent be confident that, if the provision was restated in the same terms, that would give you confidence that those you speak for understand what the expectation is? If the bill becomes law and even just changes it slightly, we could get into an area of uncertainty that could lead to problems of interpretation. Have I understood that correctly?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before you move on, Sue, I just want to ask Gordon Martin something. Kenneth Meechan has said that Glasgow actively tries to answer freedom of information requests as soon as possible, and it is not a case of waiting until day 19. Is that your experience with other industries, or do you frequently wait until day 15 or 16 and then get a request for clarification?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
A very short one.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We will look at that issue in subsequent questions. Gordon Martin, would the bill’s provisions add to openness?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Chris Milne, you mentioned university spin-offs. What happens with the GDPR officer in relation to them? Do they use the university officer? Obviously, there is a trigger point when the spin-off becomes its own company, but what happens in the transitional period?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
With regard to the environment of openness in public authorities in practice, do you not think that the bill would allow them to take the next step? As you said, you and those you represent are very open in your responses, but do you not think that it would aid all public authorities to take a step towards being more open with the people who, in effect, fund them?