The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1812 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
I will dig into that a bit more. There seems to have been a historical view, rightly or wrongly, that there were procedural challenges with registering to vote, which was the reason that people were giving. However, some of the more current research suggests that the reasons are more attitudinal, with people actively choosing not to register to vote.
Has the Scottish Government had any thoughts, or done any work, on the two different aspects? Historically—as you said, minister—there has been a responsibility on politicians in that regard: go out and find those people, urge them to register to vote and then hopefully persuade them to vote for you. That seems to address very much the procedural side, and it is an argument that we have been having for decades.
However, to echo what you and Ivan McKee have said, the figures show more than that. The attitudinal question is this. Is there a group of people who do not want to put their heads over the parapet on that public document, or are you aware of any other attitudinal reasons that may positively lead people to not want to register?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
That seems to be one of the challenges—we all have subjective evidence, but there is very little objective evidence out there.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
It is interesting—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
Maybe we will return after the publication of your response.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
I am doing that typical convener thing of being conscious of time, because I want to raise both the subjective and objective questions about intimidation of candidates, particularly of unsuccessful candidates. Can you give us any insight into the returns that you have had about people’s experience of intimidation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
Are we getting any closer to that understanding or are we still some distance from being able to define and comprehend the situation? Where are we on that journey?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the 18th meeting in 2023 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. We have received no apologies this morning.
Our first agenda item is a decision on whether to take in private items 3 and 4. Item 3 will be consideration of the evidence session that we are about to hold with the Electoral Commission, and item 4 will be consideration of the findings of the proxy voting evaluation. Do we agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that timely synopsis of the report, especially in a year that has been quite active from an electoral point of view, with voter identification and other matters, and certainly with the flurry that occurred only a few days ago, on 1 November, when digital imprints suddenly became the talk of all the corridors up and down the Parliament.
I am glad that you are open for questions. I will kick off in the first instance and refer back to correspondence from 13 September 2023, which highlighted the lateness of the report this year. There has been an apology for its being late and recognition of the pressure that lateness puts on the people who await such things. I am very grateful for that.
The letter said:
“Neither the Commission nor the NAO was sufficiently well-resourced to manage these processes to the timetable originally specified”,
so an extension to the timetable was agreed. Then, as I said, there was an apology that is wholly accepted.
I will aim this at Sean McNally. Could you explain what you mean about the challenge with regard to resourcing? Is it an on-going problem?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
Evelyn Tweed, can I come to you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to lead off on the next part or on question 6?