The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
So, even though all the issues were handed to the ministers, they did not have an in-person meeting to discuss it with the shipbuilding experts.
On 8 October 2015, an email was sent to Derek Mackay and Keith Brown. The sender’s name is redacted, as is a list of other people who were copied into the correspondence. It states that the
“DFM approved the financial implications of the contract award prior to the announcement by FM on 31 August that FMEL were ‘preferred bidder’.”
It goes on to say:
“it is clear that the Board of CMAL are still concerned”.
At the end, it asks for the minister’s confirmation that he is aware of the issues and is
“content to give approval ... to proceed.”
It also asks whether:
“the Minister wanted to speak to a representative of the CMAL Board”.
Is it fair to say that it was the Deputy First Minister who was made fully aware of the financial implications prior to the announcement by the First Minister and that it was him who authorised the contract to go ahead?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
It looks as though the ministers were not happy with the financial implications, so they handed it over to the Deputy First Minister to give authorisation.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
He moved on to another Government position.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
Right.
In an evidence session that we had with the Auditor General for Scotland, he confirmed that
“In the absence of formal written authority under the terms of the Scottish public finance manual in Scotland ... If an accountable officer does not request such written authority, the accountability for the decision rests with the accountable officer.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 28 April 2022; c 28-29.]
Why would the accountable officer not have obtained that, and why would it not have been stored safely? My question is due to the number of issues that have been raised throughout.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
How long was Mr Middleton in that role?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
He was experienced in his role, then.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
Was there a reason that he left? Was it for another job? What was the reason for his leaving so soon after the contract was signed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
The accountabilities include ensuring that risks are managed effectively and that procurement guidelines are met, and the requirement to seek written authority from ministers if any action is inconsistent with proper performance of the accountable officer’s functions.
You commented earlier that the job is to deliver on ministers’ wishes. Why would somebody with seven years’ experience not put all that into practice? Numerous concerns have been raised around the contracts. Why would somebody with that amount of experience not get written confirmation from a minister of the decisions that were made?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
I find it hard to believe that he did not get that confirmation.
In a letter to the Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure, Investment and Cities dated 20 August 2015, various issues are raised. Ministerial approval was “sought by ... 27 August”, which is just seven days after the letter was received, because the minister was on holiday. The letter states that the date had
“already been extended for 2 months”
—that was for signing the contracts.
Paragraph 8 states:
“CalMac will not be in a position to fully endorse the shipbuilding documentation by the required deadline”
and that
“further efforts will be undertaken during the detailed design of the vessel by FMEL to address any outstanding points.”
It goes on to highlight issues concerning
“the access of the vessels to the various ports they may serve”
and the
“requirement for modifications at some ports.”
It notes that the vessels are dual fuel, and that
“LNG brings some logistics challenges ... and may require some additional fuelling infrastructure.”
A lot of issues, including infrastructure issues, were being raised, other than just the ferries. Why was there such a last-minute rush to get that signed off? It had already been extended by two months—the minister went on holiday, and it was then given to the cabinet secretary to sign off. Why was there such a last-minute rush? Was it because of the number of issues in the contract?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
Was a meeting held involving CMAL, Transport Scotland and the ministers? Did they all come together in a meeting to discuss all the issues that they had?