The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
How often do you review the projects? The Carlock wall scheme has now been going on for three years, and a main transport route is down to a single lane.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
When you found out that it was not going to give you the builders refund guarantee, which was part of the tendering process, why did you not cancel the contract at that point and go back to the tendering process? In the communication that you have sent through, that seemed to be your preferred choice.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Section 6.9 of your submission states:
“CMAL were told that they should not seek a Ministerial direction by the Ministers in relation to contract award of the Vessels to FMEL. However, the Board were sufficiently concerned about the Contracts in all the circumstances instead to seek a letter from the Ministers holding CMAL harmless in the event that the Contracts encountered the financial and technical issues identified in the risks paper.”
At that point, you seemed very, very concerned. I still do not understand why CMAL did not just go in and cancel the contract.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Therefore, you were told to go in—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
I have a question about the ports. The two ferries that are coming into service run on diesel and liquefied natural gas. Has work started on the bunkering facilities to store that? It has also been commented on that the vessels are larger than the ones that are currently in operation, so the ports are too short to take them. Again, has work started in that regard?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Are they expected to be completed by the time the vessels come into operation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Section 3 of your submission is on “Provision of Refund Guarantees”. In section 3.6, you state that
“CMAL had no awareness of, or involvement in, these exchanges.”
That was in reference to exchanges between MSPs and so on about the non-provision of the refund guarantee from Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd. When did you find out that FMEL was not giving the builders refund guarantee and why did you not go back to the tendering process at that point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. On procurement, which you mentioned in your opening statement, one of the stated aims on your website is to be cost effective. To what extent do you consider the procurement of vessels 801 and 802 to be cost effective?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
What minister was it?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Why did you not get a copy of that? It says in the paperwork somewhere that you asked for a letter of comfort. You state:
“The chair requested that Transport Scotland provide CMAL with a letter of comfort if required. John Nicholls agreed that a letter of comfort would be provided to CMAL.”
However, there does not seem to be a lot of communication or evidence to show that the letter of comfort was put in.