The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1169 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
Morag McNeill from CMAL said that it became aware on 21 August 2015 that FMEL could not provide a guarantee and that the preferred option was to go back to the tendering process. She said that, at the CMAL board meeting on 25 August,
“Transport Scotland was clear that the announcement was going ahead.”
When asked whether CMAL was happy to go forward, she said:
“Our preference was to retender. We were authorised by our shareholder to proceed. That was an instruction to proceed.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 30 June 2022; c 13, 5.]
Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract to FMEL? Was it a kind of jobs for the boys situation? There has been talk of the relationship between the Scottish Government and Jim McColl. Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
I will keep this question short. Would an announcement such as that normally have come through the cabinet secretary, a minister or Transport Scotland? Who would normally give you the proposal? Would it be a special adviser?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
CMAL had strong objections to the high-profile announcement of the preferred bidder. Given that the contract negotiations were still under way, did you not think that it was inappropriate for you to make the announcement?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
Were you aware that the CMAL board wanted to stop the procurement process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
Were you aware at any point that the board wanted to stop the process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
How much knowledge did you have before you made the announcement? Did that announcement make it harder for you to go in and stop the contract? It would seem that it was CMAL’s preference to stop the tendering process, but you still went ahead with the contract.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Sharon Dowey
Who took the decision to make the announcement in August?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. Recommendation 13 states that the
“Public Bodies Unit should ensure that coaching and/or mentoring support is offered to the chief executive of every public body, particularly newly-appointed chief executives and those facing challenging situations or intense scrutiny.”
In its response, the Scottish Government indicates that it will increase the support that is provided to chief executives as accountable officers, including by developing a coaching and mentoring system. Will you provide an update on the progress of that work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Sharon Dowey
The briefing paper suggests that the Scottish Government did not follow advice from the Poverty and Inequality Commission to ensure that its actions were more clearly linked to targets for reducing child poverty and to be clear about what the impact of each action was expected to be. The paper goes on to state that, because the Scottish Government did not set out what impact the child poverty delivery plan was expected to have, it was not possible to make a proper evaluation of whether the plan delivered its aims. Why did the Scottish Government not act on the commission’s advice and why did it not take steps to ensure that the impact of the plan on child poverty could be properly assessed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2022
Sharon Dowey
Okay. Thank you.