The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
Other stakeholders need to play their part.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
Can you clarify something? You talked about warranted officers. Are they people who are basically on the front line—out in the street?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
Okay. I have one more quick question, which goes back to training. It is about the number of courses and how much focus there is on training. We heard from the first panel about a lack of training on human resources issues—that people were not always trained to the right standard. The SPF said that 3,500 officers were not safety trained. Does that number refer to warranted officers, who should be out on the streets?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
We have the lowest police numbers since 2007, and there are reports that 945 officers are eligible to retire before next summer. What are your views on current staffing levels? Are we doing enough to deal with people who are on modified duties? Is the situation sustainable? If you have one person on modified duties and then somebody else comes in with the same issues, you could end up with a whole police force on modified duties, which would mean that officers were not able to do front-line duties.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
We have heard about the many benefits of body-worn video cameras, not least the change in behaviour of the public, which it is hoped will lead to a reduction in assaults on officers. Will you advise the committee of the reasons for the further delay on issuing those to officers?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
You said that you would issue 17,000 officers with body-warn video cameras, but we know that, at the moment, police numbers are at their lowest level since 2007. Unfortunately, I do not think that you have 17,000 officers to give them to. What are your views on the current staffing levels and the impact of that on police officers’ mental health? What staffing levels do you think would be sufficient?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
Did you say that we should have 16,600 officers?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
That is a budgeted establishment. Is that the same as required levels? Do you think that you need more officers?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
I will come back to staffing levels. We already know that policing levels are at their lowest since 2007. We heard from witnesses on the previous panel about the challenges that they currently face. We heard from DCC Alan Speirs that staffing levels are budgeted at 16,600 officers, which is Police Scotland’s target. What levels do you see as being sufficient, and do you have any concerns about the upcoming budget?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning and thanks for coming. My first question is a query on the budgets. The FBU submission says that the capital budget is increasing by £10.3 million and that the real-term revenue increase is £9.1 million after deducting £4.4 million for the previous year’s settlement. The SFRS submission says that the revenue has a cash uplift of £9.5 million after deducting £4.1 million for the previous year’s pay settlement. There are slight differences in the figures, but the SFRS submission says that you are still faced with making further savings of approximately £4 million in 2024-25 to offset pressures from staff pay awards and non-pay inflation. Can you clarify that there was not an actual real-terms increase and that you still had to make cuts?