The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1158 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
They could sleep it off overnight, and they were probably not all charged in the morning.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
From the evidence, it seems that one of the conversations that still needs to happen through the partnerships and collaborations is about who actually pays for this. We spoke earlier about physical spaces and multidisciplinary staff, but we also heard that the health service will not pay for those. It sounds as though this is a health problem that the police are having to pay for. As the Criminal Justice Committee, we want to get those conversations concluded so that the police can go back to policing.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
I am sorry, but I am not talking about carving out or taking somebody else’s budget. My question is whether they are making the best use of their budget. For example, the Scottish Police Federation has said in its evidence that anyone who is in crisis but
“under the influence of alcohol will not be”
assessed
“by a medical professional”,
so police officers will be required to wait with them. While the police are sitting with people who are under the influence of alcohol, we have other constituents who are sitting complaining about antisocial behaviour. That sort of thing is taking the police away from their role, which is policing. From the conversations that you have had with other cabinet secretaries and among the group that you chair, do you think that they are doing enough? Are you seeing actions that are helping to alleviate that particular pressure on the police?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
In some areas.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
The evidence has been excellent this morning, and I have found everything really interesting. I just wish that I had the magic wand that would help us to find the solution.
Obviously, as a justice committee, we are looking at the issue of justice, but, given a lot of the things that we have been listening to, this seems like a healthcare problem, too. I agree with the police wanting to go in and do a reset in order to see what functions they should actually be taking control of, but another issue to think about is antisocial behaviour. We, along with many other members, are bringing that issue up a lot in the chamber, and it is a huge issue for constituents and businesses. However, the police are unable to respond to it, because they are tied up.
In its evidence, the SPF has said that anyone in crisis but
“under the influence of alcohol will not be”
assessed
“by a medical professional”,
which means that police officers are required to wait with them. We have heard a lot about collaborative approaches and partnership working, and it all sounds great, but I am interested in what is being done on the healthcare side of things to take the pressure off the police.
Dr Steel mentioned services but talked about them being provided from Monday to Friday. He then mentioned the care when it counts service, but I thought, “Well, it’s not when it counts if it’s only Monday to Friday.” Because we have a huge alcohol problem, a lot of that will happen out of hours—it will not be from Monday to Friday, when people are at work; it is when they get home at night or at the weekend.
I am interested in all the conversations that you are having about collaborative working. What are your partners saying about improving services and providing a 24/7 service, as the police force already does?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do you see enough movement on 24/7 services being made available?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
Are you seeing enough movement from other agencies on 24/7 provision? Once you have managed to get someone off the bridge, or if you have someone who is drunk and incapable, is there provision from the third sector or anywhere else?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
Dr Heyman, do you want to make any comments?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Sharon Dowey
You said that in your earlier evidence—that, after 24 hours, they were a different person.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Sharon Dowey
You have covered some of my questions in your answers to Katy Clark, but I am also interested in the financial impact of GPS monitoring.
At the moment, the policy note accompanying the instrument says that there is a one-time cost of £210,000 for the roll-out of GPS monitoring and that the cost of information technology change will “fall to the Scottish Government”. It then says that G4S has GPS monitoring in its contract. It also says that only around 10 to 20 people will be monitored with GPS initially.
I want to get more detail on that. Does the cost refer to money that G4S has already been given? My concern is that that money has already been spent on other things, such as the radio frequency monitoring that G4S already does. We welcome the fact that people will be on GPS monitoring, and I am glad to see that being brought in. However, my concern is that, if G4S has already spent the money on other things, it will not do the GPS monitoring that is required. Does G4S have the capacity to do that monitoring?