The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 917 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Craig Hoy
I have two quick questions on the impact on the housing market. We know that there is an affordability issue in the Scottish housing market relative to income. We also know that certain developers have had their margins squeezed intensely and that, for example, the Stewart Milne Group has gone to the wall. What assessment have you made of the effect on the price of, let us say, a £250,000 starter home? Based on your discussions with developers, how much of the levy will they pass on to house buyers?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Craig Hoy
We are talking about public safety and people’s financial security in relation to their properties. Just for clarity, I assume that the £17 million or so was spent in-year and that, moving forward, you intend to fund the remediation works out of future budget settlements. Is there a risk that the process could slow because the Scottish Government did not have sufficient funds in-year to fund the accelerated pace of remediation work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Craig Hoy
So a new developer would be exempt.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Craig Hoy
Good morning, cabinet secretary. To go back to the figures, in March 2020, you received £97.1 million in Barnett consequentials for remediation. The response to the freedom of information request from March this year, which has been referred to, said that £16.9 million had already been spent. I want to delve a little deeper into the remaining £80 million. Do you have that money at hand to spend if there should be an accelerated period of remediation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
I do not want to repeat or, perhaps, to labour some of the points that the convener has already made, but I note that paragraph 5 of the report says:
“The auditors reported that they had not received all information and explanations required for their audit in relation to the property, plant and equipment balances. The auditors also raised concerns about the overall quality and timeliness of Scottish Canals accounting records and working papers. This has led to significant delays to the audit process.”
I can second guess what you are going to say, given your responses to Mr Leonard, but is it safe to say that your concerns go far wider than the issues related to the property, plant and equipment balances?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
Regardless of the size of the team, that sounds pretty poor, given that we are talking about the public purse. The report states that auditors did not receive all the information or explanation that was sufficient for the audit in terms of property, plant and equipment balances. Did you get the impression that the staff who were there were fully engaged with the process, and were they open and transparent with you?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
Before I delve into detail about a couple of infrastructure projects, I want to go back a bit. The Cabinet Secretary for Finance has said that there will be a prioritisation exercise in relation to infrastructure spending. You have said a little bit about how you will approach that in relation to net zero and public services. Is it therefore safe to say that road projects will be given less prioritisation than perhaps net zero? Can you see a conflation of the two in relation to road infrastructure helping to achieve net zero objectives?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
Has that prioritisation exercise changed since the Bute house agreement?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
My next question might be one for Alison Irvine. You will be aware, particularly in relation to South Scotland residents in the Scottish Borders, West Lothian, East Lothian and Midlothian, of the £120 million planned potential intervention at Sheriffhall roundabout to relieve congestion at what is now a very congested pinchpoint. In 2020, it was held up quite significantly by a campaign that was led by the Green Party, with a local public inquiry getting under way earlier this year.
Do you have a revised timetable for the Sheriffhall intervention? Is it perhaps one of the areas for reprioritisation? After all, at any given time of the day, cars can be sitting idling in huge tailbacks, which will be having an environmental and economic cost. Where does something like Sheriffhall fit into the broader prioritisation exercise, given that one party in the coalition is clearly opposed to such interventions?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Craig Hoy
Obviously, accountability is linked to capacity and competence. Do you get the impression that there was some failure of past or present leadership in the organisation?
09:30