The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1090 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
I am just asking about restaurant services, which are listed in schedule 3 of the budget submission, on page 42. The cost was identified at £0.8 million. The submission also alludes to the fact that there could potentially be
“a period of double running”
of the contract, which is presently up for review and award. The cost of that would be £46,000. Is that just a periodic retendering of the contract, or is there a particular reason for that coming forward now?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Thank you. Finally, in respect of the expenditure in relation to the lobbying register, is it now perhaps time to look at the lobbying register more generally to see whether it is fit for purpose? I know that you have committed around £400,000 to a new platform on which the register will operate, but is it time, perhaps in the next session of Parliament, to look at the operation and the efficacy of the lobbying register more generally?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Fine. Lastly, minister, implicit—or, perhaps, explicit—in this is an acceptance that you can achieve behavioural change in the corporate environment by reducing or eliminating taxes. Looking at the structure of LBTT in a corporate environment, would it be a goal of the Government to try to make sure that there were greater incentives to bring those sorts of developments to Scotland than the incentives in other parts of the UK? At this point, what assessment have you made of the competitiveness of the LBTT structure versus the full stamp duty regime in England?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Good morning. For the record, in relation to the structure of investment zones and the way in which this relief will apply in Scotland, are those broadly comparable or an absolute replica of the way in which investment zones in England are applying reliefs on stamp duty?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Fine. I turn to the elephant in the room, which is the election. There is a significant projection in there, a large element of which is contingencies. Perhaps Mr Carlaw or Mr McGill might want to say for the record what those contingencies are, what the contingent dependencies are and what may or may not happen that could result in that £6 million contingency being used.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
I note that some investment zones and freeports in England have not been designated as special tax sites, whereas the two in Scotland have. Is there any reason why some investment zones in England are not special tax sites but both of those in Scotland are?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Carlaw. You will be aware that, throughout Government now, there is real pressure to look at making efficiency savings. In your evidence, you have talked about the possibility of a 5 per cent increase in productivity, because of the shorter working week, and the possibility of carrying a 5 per cent vacancy rate. Does that suggest that, in the past, we might not have been as efficient as we could have been? How much further and faster can you go in trying to make efficiency savings in future years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
My next question links to that point in relation to pressures on MSPs’ offices. The flipside of the use of technology is that we are all receiving far more automated requests, particularly on emotive issues such as euthanasia, gender, animal welfare and so on. The Westminster staff support budget is now somewhere in the region of £280,000 per year for MPs who are not based in London. As with the point that Jackson Carlaw made, MSPs seem to have fallen behind. I am not necessarily advocating for an increase in MSPs’ office cost allowances, but what benchmarking has the corporate body done over time to see whether the staff cost provision is keeping up with, for example, the Westminster Parliament?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Absolutely.
I will ask about some of the grander areas of spending. It appears that restaurant services potentially cost £0.8 million—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Craig Hoy
Nor might you, Mr Carlaw.