The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 743 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
The minister has just described the UK Government’s approach as an “act of sabotage”, but it is this Government that is cancelling the scheme after spending £218 million—[Interruption.] Yes, the Scottish Government has spent £218 million—it is there in black and white on the Scottish Government’s website—[Interruption.] [Mercedes Villalba has corrected this contribution. See end of report.]
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Will the minister give way?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its progress in establishing a peace institute by the end of 2022, as set out in its 2021-22 programme for government. (S6O-02330)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
—with no proposed alternative to meet its target of recycling 70 per cent of waste by 2025.
Will the minister be honest with the public and take some responsibility for the fact that the SNP and the First Minister himself sabotaged the scheme by repeatedly talking it down during their bitter leadership contest? [Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Will the minister take an intervention on that point?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 7 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Mercedes Villalba MSP has identified an error in her contribution and provided the following correction.
At Col 31, paragraph 6,
Original text—
The minister has just described the UK Government’s approach as an “act of sabotage”, but it is this Government that is cancelling the scheme after spending £218 million—[Interruption.] Yes, the Scottish Government has spent £218 million—it is there in black and white on the Scottish Government’s website—[Interruption.]
Corrected Text—
The minister has just described the UK Government’s approach as an “act of sabotage”, but it is this Government that is cancelling the scheme after spending £218 thousand—[Interruption.] Yes, the Scottish Government has spent £218 thousand—it is there in black and white on the Scottish Government’s website—[Interruption.]
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Sections 65 and 66 relate to expenses. The Law Society, as well as other legal stakeholders who appeared before the committee, raised concerns about the current policy underpinning section 65, which sets out principles for determining how legal bills are paid for in trust cases. Specifically, it provides that trustees will be personally liable for those expenses in certain situations, including when the trust fund does not have enough resources to cover them.
The Law Society has said that section 65 will deter people from becoming trustees and might lead trustees to unfavourably settle or abandon legal proceedings for fear of personal liability, which would mean their having to pay out from their own funds. We also heard from various legal stakeholders that obtaining trustee insurance for personal liability is not straightforward.
Having heard those views, do you share the concerns about section 65?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
But, at this stage, you are not sure which way the balance will go.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Do you see that as a potential issue and that who the definition applies to could be unclear?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I want to move us on to part 2 of the bill, which is the part of the bill that deals with inheritance. Section 72 relates to the right of a spouse or civil partner to inherit. A range of stakeholders, including the Law Society of Scotland, have said that a distinction should be drawn between spouses or civil partners who were living with the deceased person at the time of their death and spouses or civil partners who had previously separated from the deceased person but not divorced or had the partnership dissolved. Having heard the views that have been expressed, are you persuaded that section 72 should be amended to make that distinction?