The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1554 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
I mean in general.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
You have done some excellent work. Admittedly, you have only been in post for less than a year. There has been some great work on the spotlight reports and in clarifying issues in a complex landscape, so given everything that you are doing, if I were the Prison Service, I would come to you, as an organisation that is independent of Government and the Parliament, to seek your input and advice on a very complex topic. Has the Prison Service sought your advice and input?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
That is a chunk of work in itself.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
This is where the rubber hits the road on this issue for the committee. Let us say that we are raising a red flag now. You agree that legal aid is a huge area in relation to access to justice. We are going into human rights budgeting, and this is a case in point. A decision is about to be made, following poor consultation, that is based on finances—block fees basically average out cases and treat people like widgets, not human beings. The solicitors are apoplectic, I would say. They are massively concerned and have come to us and asked whether we can do anything. Can the commission raise red flags? If so, how can we work together—the commission and the committee—and say, “Put the brakes on”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you, Jan. We hear you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
I will be talking about hospital care in a minute. This is just about prisons and the Scottish Prison Service.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you for coming this morning. My question is about the spotlight project on places of detention. It highlights a number of areas of serious concerns, including the widespread use of segregated or solitary confinement and lack of mental health care support for women. What changes, if any, have you seen in response to the findings?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
So, the Prison Service has sought your opinion.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
Thank you.
My second question is about hospitals and the Women’s Rights Network report, “How safe are our Scottish hospitals?” I mention this because it is about humanity and people when they are at their most vulnerable. People are at their most vulnerable in prison—I spoke about prisons—or in hospital.
The report highlighted significant systematic failures in Scottish hospitals, especially mental health wards. That was amplified by the Sunday Post coverage, and there was a parliamentary debate and a round-table event. There is another round table tomorrow, which will include some of the health boards, Health Improvement Scotland and the new Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland, and it will focus on mixed-sex wards.
We are talking about humanity, safety and human rights. I mentioned the report, as well as the Sunday Post article. We had a big debate in the Parliament, framing the issue as both a public health issue and human rights issue. However, the Scottish Human Rights Commission has not touched on the issue. I realise that you cannot boil the ocean, but it is a big issue and has been a big issue this year.
Professor O’Hagan, the SHRC is independent of the Scottish Government and the Parliament. Is the Women’s Rights Network report on your radar and do you think that it should be?
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Tess White
I hear you and I think that this committee hears you. There are multiple layers to what you have just said, but how can the commission help navigate through that?