The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1659 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
During the debate on the issue in the chamber, there was huge criticism of the way in which the Scottish Legal Aid Board operates and its poor consultation. Has that been heard as well?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Thank you.
11:45
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
I hear you. Are you doing your own safeguarding and due diligence checks on organisations to which you give funding?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
I am talking about your accountability, minister, and the cabinet secretary’s accountability. You cannot delegate accountability for health and safety. Are you satisfied that every pound of Government money—of the taxpayer’s money—that you are spending is being spent wisely and properly? Have you done your own safeguarding checks?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
No. I have taken up enough time on this. We will send you the Sunday Post article and I will write to you separately. I ask you, pending a review and an investigation, if you would consider withdrawing funding. I will leave that question with you and I will pass back to the convener now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Good morning. I will start with the cabinet secretary, then go to the minister and then go back to the cabinet secretary.
Cabinet secretary, what impact has the new strategic integrated impact assessments approach had on the budget process?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
That is true. However, let us look at the outcomes in relation to violence against women and girls. This committee has had debates on that in the Parliament fairly recently, and we looked at evidence that was compiled by the Women’s Rights Network on sexual assaults in hospitals and the lack of single-sex wards, lengthy waits for rape support services, and the wider deterioration of women’s safety and rights. It is misleading to say in row 31 of the spreadsheet, on the budget line on violence against women and girls—a topic we have had huge debates and several committee sessions on—that it is all exceptional, exceptional, exceptional. Cabinet secretary, I put it to you that you might want to revisit that when you are looking at the outcomes.
I will go back to what you and the minister said at the start about a “safe, prosperous and green society” and the duty to “protect the most vulnerable”. On protections for the most vulnerable, many organisations out there would not score you as exceptional.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
It is not a question of liking or disliking—I think of the head of Children in Need stepping down, for instance. There were huge concerns in the Sunday Post only last week regarding safeguarding at a particular organisation. Significant concerns have been raised in the national press about an organisation that the Scottish Government is funding, but do you have accountability for and responsibility over that spend? What I have heard just now is no—it is delegated to Inspiring Scotland.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Tess White
Good morning, minister. Thank you for acknowledging that the committee’s recommendations have not been included, as that was what my first question was going to be about. The committee notes that the changes to civil legal aid that we proposed have not been taken forward. You have given a short explanation as to why our recommendations were not progressed, by saying that you need to do more work. Do you acknowledge the significant and serious concerns that exist, notably from Govan Law Centre and from one of the leading law firms in my area the bulk of whose work relates to adults with incapacity? Those concerns were about the rates being too low and about the very poor consultation from the Scottish Legal Aid Board.
Admittedly, we have less than two months to go in this session of Parliament, but will you look at the issue before the end of the session, or are you going to kick the can down the road into the next parliamentary session? Do you accept the points that we made about the rates being too low and the levels of bureaucracy being too high, and about the Scottish Legal Aid Board’s poor consultation with key stakeholders?