The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1388 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
That is great. I will ask two questions then.
Both are for Carol Calder. Audit Scotland has highlighted the concerns about the lack of clarity in budget documentation on the impact of specific budget interventions on long-term health outcomes. In your opinion, how can the NPF improve transparency and ensure that budgetary decisions are closely linked to achieving measurable health improvements?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Professor Donaldson, Audit Scotland highlighted concerns about the lack of clarity in budget documentation regarding the impact of specific budget interventions on long-term health outcomes, and we have heard this morning that it is hard to see where money is being spent in the Scottish budget. How can the NPF improve transparency and ensure that budgetary decisions are closely linked to achieving measurable health improvements?
10:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
So the issue is accountability and aligned targets—that is, NHS boards not having aligned targets with the IJBs and the IJBs having split accountability.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Thank you.
A lot of what you have said this morning about prioritisation versus salami slicing and fiscal prudence has resonated with me. Some talk about austerity while others talk about fiscal prudence; however, they are at different ends of the scale. What you are saying is that we cannot go on unconstrained.
Let me give you a specific example. In the financial year 2022-23, more than 661,705 bed days were lost due to delayed discharge. That is the highest figure ever reported, with an annual cost to Scotland of a staggering £1 billion. As the IPPR has emphasised, it is a key example of not meeting the needs of our older people and, indeed, of depriving them of dignity.
A decade ago, this issue was a major priority for the Scottish Government; indeed, it basically pledged to eradicate delayed discharge. So, it was high priority; it was one of the top few things that had to be done, and the focus was on that. My question, therefore, is this: how, in your opinion, can the NPF finally ensure that funding is used effectively to address the negative outcomes that we are seeing for Scotland’s older people?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Accountability of what?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
What has been said about it being hard to see where the money is being spent and what the outcomes are is alarming. We do not know what the outcomes are, and we cannot manage what we do not measure properly. The committee’s meeting this morning is extremely important, because we are pressing pause and asking whether things are working. Is there any way of creating some hard wiring so that we know what the impact will be of spending X amount of money on something? As I said, the situation is alarming.
In its pre-budget scrutiny last year, the committee heard that the NPF is described as the Government’s “north star”, but the underpinning route has not been adequately mapped out. Is the NPF the best way to determine outcomes-based budgeting, or is there a better way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tess White
Convener, do I have time for two questions or just one?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Tess White
Professor Bell, thank you for your written submission, which I found particularly helpful. You highlight the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s concerns over the financial impact of the Scottish Government’s public sector pay assumptions. Can you talk us through the anticipated impact of the in-year budget cuts for IJBs that you outline in your submission?