Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 854 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

The Public Health Scotland evaluation of MUP is riddled with holes, as are the Scottish Government’s conclusions about its effectiveness. That is not my view; the Law Society of Scotland said:

“In our view, the study does not provide enough evidence that the introduction of MUP ‘saved lives’”,

and other stakeholders in the Scottish Government’s consultation described the evaluation as

“selective, biased, misleading or flawed”.

In your opinion, and ahead of the expiry of the sunset clause, how does that square with the robust evaluation that former health secretary Nicola Sturgeon promised during the parliamentary passage of the bill in 2012?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

Minister, I have a question about uprating, but I would like to go back to harmful drinking. If you remember, the bill’s financial memorandum emphasised that minimum pricing would

“reduce the consumption of alcohol by harmful drinkers”.

However, if we look at the facts, we see a 25 per cent increase in the number of alcohol-related deaths over the past three years alone and, over the past 10 years, the number of people accessing alcohol treatment services has gone down by 40 per cent. Do you agree that harmful and hazardous drinkers are the ones who need the greatest help?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

Earlier, you said that the MUP will impact all drinkers. However, it will hit social drinkers, in particular, in their shopping basket. Rather than the MUP targeting harmful drinking, it will hit everybody in the social drinker group.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

Do you recognise that there are massively differing opinions on the issue? Many people think that, rather than being a silver bullet, MUP is a blunt instrument with massive holes in it.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

You are confirming that that was modelling, not statistics.

I will go back to the uprating question. Minister, you talked about whether we might use RPI or CPI in the future. Do you intend to come back to Parliament when there is a review so that there can be a robust analysis that is based on facts, not modelling?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 March 2024

Tess White

Let me check that, minister. You are open-minded about coming back to the committee, hopefully when you have some facts rather than models, which would be a good opportunity to come and have another review and to discuss and debate the policy.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 March 2024

Tess White

Thank you, minister. I meant for people who, when the bill becomes law, want to pray. There will be the 200m buffer zone, but if they want to pray, they could be told to go into the chapel or place of worship and silently pray there.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 March 2024

Tess White

I am interested to hear your view on balance and proportionality. On one hand, there is the right of women to access healthcare and not be intimidated and harassed. On the other hand, we heard last week from faith groups that are very passionate about their right to pray. We also heard from a woman who had basically changed her mind at the last minute because of that influence.

Therefore, given that there are chapels or places of worship at hospital sites, if faith groups need to pray—the point was made about praying at sites—would it be reasonable to say that they can go to the chapel or place of worship to pray, rather than their feeling the need to intimidate or harass someone, or do whatever is defined as “silent prayer”, which many women see as harassment and intimidation? I am talking about balancing the needs of women to access healthcare without fear of intimidation and the rights of faith groups to pray at the site where they feel that they need to pray.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 March 2024

Tess White

Thank you, minister.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013 (Post-legislative Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 20 February 2024

Tess White

Good morning. My first question is for Becs Barker. You talked about the good example of Dundee City Council. More than a year ago, the committee visited Granite Care Consortium in Aberdeen and heard about some good practice there.

Obviously, Dundee and Aberdeen are cities, and your recommendations recognise that there are more issues in rural areas. Some submissions that we received highlighted that people who live in rural areas are particularly disadvantaged, especially in relation to option 3. Could you expand on your thoughts about geographical disparities?