The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 787 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
The Scottish Government has not changed direction and it seems to be focusing on centralisation. Do you think that you have been heard by the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
Do you believe that the onus is on you to speak a bit more loudly, rather than the onus being on the Scottish Government to say, “We have heard you, and we are now going to take action”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
I have a quick follow-up question. If part of the issue is that there are not enough—or there is a high turnover of—social workers, so they are spread too thinly, who will do the action plans?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
My next question is about resources. The SHRC’s findings on the community living change fund, which you referred to earlier, are startling. Significant sums have been left unspent and there has been a lack of transparency and accountability relating to the fund overall. Furthermore, money has been used to renovate institutional settings, which the SHRC says is
“in direct contravention of the requirements of the right to independent living.”
That is alarming. It is absolutely shocking.
How should funding be allocated and monitored to ensure that that will not happen again? Have you raised your concerns directly with the Scottish Government? If so, what was its response?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
In relation to the 55 people who have been incarcerated for longer than 18 years and the 10 people who have been incarcerated for more than 25 years, we had a powerful witness statement, a few months ago, from an organisation called People First (Scotland). Gregor Hardie gave us each a chart that basically said “Countdown to the Scottish Government’s coming home deadline”. He said that
“the deadline has been and gone without the commitment being met.”—[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 26 November 2024; c 11.]
I have had that up on my wall as a reminder. One could say to People First (Scotland) and those families that there is a dereliction of duty by the Scottish ministers and that the issue lies at the door of the Scottish ministers.
I have a follow-up question. I was struck by the case of Linda, who appeared in the BBC documentary “Jailed: Women in Prison”. Linda has been diagnosed with Gómez–López-Hernández syndrome, which is a developmental disability, and she has been placed in custody at Wintergreen Hall, which is a specialised unit in HMP Stirling. Linda said:
“I don’t want to be out, it’s just safer in here.”
How can we ensure that women such as Linda have the support that they need when they leave an institutional setting?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
Jan, my colleague Evelyn Tweed asked about “serious gaps” in the Highlands and Islands. In the north-east of Scotland, there seem to be huge issues with rural proofing, including problems with access to healthcare and the centralisation of other services, and a lack of efficient, effective public transport. For example, the X7 bus service has been reduced, which has had huge impacts on the population, including severely negative impacts on people with learning difficulties. General practices are closing at twice the rate in rural areas as they are in the central belt, which is also a huge issue. Practices are in crisis because they are struggling to cope and survive.
That lack of rural proofing by the Scottish Government is a massive problem. In your view, what can the Scottish Government do to address it? Do you believe that Scottish ministers understand the significant impact on rural and remote communities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
So you will keep at it, but the jury is out.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
Jan, in your opinion, what barriers have prevented full implementation of the coming home implementation plan and how should accountability for the failures be enforced?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
From my experience of being on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I know that social workers are at the core of the system, but figures from the Scottish Association of Social Work paint an alarming picture. For example, 25 per cent of social workers leave the profession within six years of graduation, and 19 per cent of the profession is over the age of 55. The total vacancy rate is just under 10 per cent, and, in Angus, in my area, it is 15.7 per cent. Many of those vacancy rates are long standing. Social workers are at the core of the system, so that constant churn of social workers is alarming.
In your view, has the Scottish Government failed to follow up on the coming home implementation plan? The infrastructure, including the workforce, is simply not in place for it to do so.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Tess White
I previously sat on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and we completed an inquiry into self-directed support last year. It is clear that the system is not working. SDS is not working, and vulnerable people are being badly let down. The SHRC report highlighted specific issues with self-directed support. What are your concerns about SDS, and how can they be remedied?