The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 787 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
You are therefore confirming that the Scottish National Party Government is proactively looking at all the policies in relation to the judgment.
Minister, do you have any further detail on the forthcoming equality strategy for women and girls, which Shirley-Anne Somerville announced on 22 April? Do you have any thoughts about the organisations that will be involved in it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
Okay—thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
They can write to you and you will review—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
My question is on the rights of women, disabled people, the LGB community, the TI+ community and racialised minorities. You said at the start of the meeting that the Scottish Government is aiming to be the human rights guarantor for all people in Scotland. How will you prioritise the rights of those particular groups in upcoming policy reviews? I would specifically like to mention the fairer Scotland duty and the social security charter in that regard.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
I will—thank you.
So, you are waiting for guidance from the EHRC before the Scottish Government takes a view on switching the taps off for any funding.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
So, the Scottish Government is not funding lobby groups to give guidance on their interpretation of the law.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
You have requested meetings. Have they replied yet?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
My first question is for Ms Mulvagh. CESCR called for improved mental health services. How does your organisation view Scotland’s progress on that front?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
You said that the summer is the opportunity for the Scottish Government to look at rural proofing and the direction of travel. Is the strategy for a sustainable food programme something that you would like to see placed fairly and squarely at the feet of the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
We are tight for time and, as you say, we could spend a whole session on this issue. Mr McMillan made the point about somebody being locked away for 50 years. That is not good enough and the money could be spent elsewhere. I will not continue that discussion, but the committee is focusing on it.
In response to Lorne Berkley, I note that we are looking at autism. The focus of the committee is on patients who cannot get autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessments and on waiting times in child and adolescent mental health services. You are all in agreement that those are huge areas that need to be looked at.
I will go on to my second question. Access to affordable food is a huge issue, and nobody seems to have grasped the ears of that elephant in the room. Ms Mulvagh, you mentioned access to good-quality affordable food. I have a few facts.
Sixty per cent of the food that is consumed on this island is produced on this island, and that has not changed for about 100 years. That is a fact. Another fact is that the majority of people do not achieve the dietary requirements set by the Government, so the quality of food is going down dramatically. Charlie McMillan talked about his 86-year-old father. When we were growing up, we all got used to quality food that was locally sourced, but now the direction of travel is taking us somewhere completely different. If we were to take a holistic human rights-based approach, we should do rural proofing of our food supply to ensure that it is sustainable and affordable. I know that Professor O’Hagan mentioned that theme when we talked about rural proofing of health. However, instead, we have this drive to industrialise our landscape with huge monster pylons and substations. It looks as though our energy strategy and planning are geared towards one thing, and the danger with that direction of travel is that we will not be able to source our food locally or have quality food.
Professor O’Hagan, what are your views on the potential for a human rights-based national food strategy in Scotland, bearing in mind the context of that holistic landscape?