The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 891 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
I hear you, but we heard the point earlier that the schools are the ones who hold the coats. After listening to Gina Wilson and Juliet Harris, I have to say that, if I was a teacher or a headteacher, I would go to the council’s legal department and say, “We’ve got a situation where the parent and the child can’t agree and we don’t know what to do. Can we have legal advice?” It is no wonder that COSLA is concerned about all of this. If I was a headteacher, I would be massively concerned about it.
Gavin, what is your take on it, from the parent, teacher and child point of view?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
You said earlier that you already have enough on your plate and that this will be just one extra burden.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
COSLA has said that there has been no mapping, gap analysis or data collection, so the question is, how can you legislate if you have not done the prep work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
That is really powerful feedback to the committee, particularly bearing in mind that Gavin Yates from Connect said previously that the bill could cause harm if it goes through. You have said that it could cause conflict but Gavin Yates went further. What is your view of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
Susan used the word “danger”, Douglas mentioned the word “conflict” and we have previously heard the words “harm” and “weeds” as well as the phrase “holes in the web”. Thank you for that.
I pass back to our convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Tess White
On my point about access to justice, we already have a problem with legal aid. We have looked at only three local authorities but, for the whole of Scotland, based on the stats and the estimates, 4,000 pupils could fall into the category. There could be disputes between what a parent wants and what a child wants. We need to think about that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Tess White
I have two questions and will address my first one to Professor O’Hagan. You have just talked about the intent of the bill and Dr Hill talked about the lack of a scoping exercise. We looked at three local authorities and our data shows that, of 700,000 pupils, 143 pupils withdrew from RO only, nine pupils withdrew from RME and 61 pupils withdrew from both. Why not wait until the Scottish human rights bill and do it all properly? We have four legal experts here who support the view that the bill is a sticking plaster. So, Professor O’Hagan, why not just wait until the Scottish human rights bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Tess White
My second question builds on what my colleague Dr Gosal talked about in relation to capacity. The bill is looking to give very young children the ability to make decisions, when the age of capacity is usually 16. My understanding is that a child is legally allowed to be left alone at age 12 and that there is a different age for when a child is allowed to be left overnight. Therefore, the law must be very clear.
Professor O’Hagan talked about access to justice. If there is a conflict, will legal aid need to be provided to children if they disagree with their parents? I understand that the age at which a child has the capacity to access legal aid is 12. My point is that the law must be clear, as the starting point in the bill is that the child has capacity. Professor Sutherland, what is your view? I know that it is very complicated, but the law must be clear.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
My next question is for Emma Congreve. The feedback that we have been given this morning is that there is, as Angela O’Hagan put it, a
“gap between narrative and practice.”
We hear these words, but it is quite damning that, although something is said, nothing happens and things are kicked down the road. In your view, does the Scottish Government’s positive narrative in the equality and fairer Scotland budget statement and in its budget responses to the committee reflect the reality in relation to policy impact and the changes that it has made to budget processes, data and documentation?
You are smiling, Emma.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
We hear you loud and clear on those very important points. The mood music can quickly turn sour if there is no delivery. I read in the papers today about carers going on strike. People have had enough if their basic needs are not being met. I also refer to the point that Emma Congreve made about the Pareto principle and the focus on the few important things. We had an example this morning of people being locked up. The committee learned about the huge percentage of women and girls with learning difficulties who are being sexually assaulted. That resonated loud and clear. The Promise, social security and violence against women and girls have also been mentioned. As I said, we hear you loud and clear.
The next evidence session is with the Minister for Equalities and the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, and it is our job to take what you have shared with us this morning, and what we have heard over the past few months, and to present it to the Scottish Government—so, thank you.