The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1752 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is actually my next question. We know that the UN’s Committee on the Rights of the Child has twice in the past seven or eight years strongly recommended that we have an opt-out option. What are your thoughts on that?
Claire Benton-Evans, you have made it very clear that there should be an opt-in and an opt-out. Do you want to say anything else about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
And all the safety issues.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. You may have heard, in the earlier evidence session, quite a lot of discussion about the potential conflict between parents’ rights as primary educators of their children and children’s rights to free expression of their spiritual or religious development in ways that suit them.
The Scottish Government’s view of the bill is that the new process would better support UNCRC articles 12 and 14 on the right to be heard and on freedom of thought, conscience and religion. How do you see that intention to give those rights legitimacy in our laws, alongside the potential conflict with parents’ rights to be primary educators?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much. My final question perhaps follows on from some of Pam Gosal’s questions about consistency and the issues across the board. I hear the views about whether or not we should have RO but, given that we do, how best can headteachers, schools, local authorities and others who are having the high-level conversations about it ensure consistency, so that—as you were saying, Fraser—the principles of inclusion and of non-stigmatising and non-othering processes are universally understood? How would you go about doing that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Yes, but as long as we have it, would that be the route?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay, that is helpful. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Rachel. That is really helpful. It is important for us to bear that in mind as we consider the bill. You mentioned the child’s increase in agency and the receding of parental rights as that happens. What mechanism do you envisage will enable that to be supported? Is it statutory guidance for schools, or training and support for teachers? Do we have the mechanisms in place or will they be enabled by the bill? Do we need to look at something else that will support that shift and the transfer of responsibility, I suppose, from the parent and state to the child?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. I saw Angela O’Hagan nodding vehemently as you were speaking. Angela, do you want to come back in on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. Elaine, do you want to comment on that? You do not have to, but you are welcome to if you want to add anything.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone. I am sorry that I cannot join you in person, but greetings from sunny Dundee.
Angela O’Hagan, you talked about the gap between narrative and practice and about the lack of fluency. One of the reasons why the committee started this process was to try to identify how we could close those gaps. What is your analysis or understanding of why there are still those gaps and the lack of fluency that you described?