The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1752 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That fundamental has to be our starting point.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I thank Stephen Allison for his comments, which I echo. I was appalled by the situation that Leah Rivka described. That should not happen in any school in any situation.
Barbara Coupar, you said that it was interesting and important that this conversation is taking place at the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee rather than at the Education, Children and Young People Committee because of the foundation of rights that underpins not only the proposals in the bill but the broader conversation. Could you say a little bit more about the conversation that takes place within Catholic education and Catholic schools on the rights in the UNCRC—in particular, article 12, on the right for young people to be heard, and article 14, on freedom of expression and freedom of religion? How do you draw those into the discussion, given some of the tensions and sensitivities that we have mentioned?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that was helpful. I suppose that we are talking about some of the tensions that folk have outlined. If there was strong disagreement between a child and their parent about how they wanted to develop their spirituality, their freedom of expression or their freedom of belief, how would you facilitate conversations about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
I put that question to the other witnesses. Given the sensitivities, tensions and potential conflicts that some of you have identified, how will society be able to support children to express their rights, as enshrined in the UNCRC, particularly those in articles 12 and 14?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much for that. It is important to note that, just because things are not brought to the surface, it does not mean that they are not rumbling underneath. Some of the examples that you have given highlight the broader issues of stigmatisation, othering and just not feeling like you belong, whether they are raised by parent or child. We will consider that carefully as we gather our evidence on the bill.
Do witnesses have any other comments on the rights?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Dr Sanchez, you have been quite clear that, in your view, the mandating of RO is the main issue, and that the distinction between RO and RME is important.
Fraser, what would your solution be, if not the provisions in the bill? Given the guidance and the statutory obligations that exist, where should the conversation about rights for parents and guardians and children and young people go? We heard quite a lot of tension about children being pitted against their parents or guardians and the consequences that that can have, especially if there are issues of family separation and so on. We also heard about the idea of enabling spiritual development in a way that is right for the individual, rather than saying, “This is how it has to happen.” Can you see a way through that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
You are looking at the statutory enforcement route.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks to you both.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. We heard in the earlier sessions this morning about some of the challenges that schools might face in facilitating such discussions. For example, anxiety may be expressed by both parents and children, or by either parents or children, in different situations. They may be anxious about even raising the issue, because they do not want to be stigmatised and show themselves to be different in some way or another.
We heard earlier about some good examples of where such conversations are handled very sensitively and cleverly in some respects. How do we ensure that there is no stigmatisation and no risk of othering? There is a risk that the issue may not be raised in a conversation at all, because children do not want to annoy their parents, and parents do not want to shine the spotlight on the child as “other”.
Do you have any further thoughts on that? What you have said is fine—I just wondered whether you wanted to add anything else.