Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 4 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1752 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 1 October 2025

Maggie Chapman

Do you have confidence in the current governance and management arrangements at the University of Dundee?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 1 October 2025

Maggie Chapman

What about governance?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 1 October 2025

Maggie Chapman

Thank you for letting me in, convener.

Good morning. I have a couple of questions, but, before I ask them, I want to put on record what is stated in my entry in the register of interests: I am rector of the University of Dundee and I sit on the university court. Because of that, I will be careful in what I ask and how I ask it.

Following on from the question that Pam Duncan-Glancy has just asked, given that we have had 11 months of this at the University of Dundee—Willie Rennie expressed his frustration at how things have or have not happened over that time—concern is being expressed that the unique situation there might be used as a political football in the broader higher education funding debate. How does the SFC respond to that particular point? How will you ensure that the unique situation at Dundee does not creep into the wider discussion about HE funding?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 1 October 2025

Maggie Chapman

What are the principles that underpin what you would expect to see in what you are working out?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

Thank you; that is clear. Does anybody else want to comment on the opt in, opt out question?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

That is a really helpful suggestion. We will take it away and tease it out. I will leave it there, convener.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

Good morning to the panel. Thank you very much for joining us and for your contributions so far.

It is quite clear from what Caitlin Fitzgerald has said and from Rachel Fox’s comments that there is a need to disaggregate RO and RME. We have heard the same from other witnesses this morning, and we will take that into our deliberations.

I have also quite clearly heard frustration—if I can put it like that—that the bill is perhaps a missed opportunity to do something not necessarily grander but much more complete on the rights of the child. I suppose that that is where I want to focus my first question. Articles 12 and 14 of the UNCRC clearly speak of the right to be heard and the freedoms of expression, conscience, thought and religion. The bill is perhaps intended to fulfil some of those rights, although perhaps not in the way that we might wish, with a stand-alone act that would be UNCRC compliant.

A question that was posed back to us earlier this morning was about a balance—or a tension—between the parent’s rights as the primary educator of their children to make those choices for them, and the UNCRC articles that I have mentioned. How do you balance those rights? Angela O’Hagan said that what we are talking about is the child’s right to religious expression, freedom of religion and so on, but do you see a way through any potential conflicts that schools would have to navigate?

Angela, I will come to you first.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

Thanks, Angela. That is really helpful. Rachel, I know that you want to comment, and I am happy to bring you in.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

Are there things that we can do in legislation to support those conversations and to prevent the stigmatising or othering, or the singling out, of individuals, whether those are the children or the parents?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Maggie Chapman

I think that we all ruminate on that in the committee. Do any other witnesses want to comment on those rights questions?