The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1648 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
You said that not everybody is eligible to access legal aid, so that could be a barrier. I will leave it there for now, but I might come back in later.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
That point about looking holistically and aiming for cohesion is really useful, because it is easy to get fixated on one little issue in one place and not think about the bigger picture.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. It is important to get that on the record.
I will shift to a couple of different questions.
What is your view on the arguments put by the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland that the SCJC does not consult very widely, or widely enough, on court rules that are intended to allow access to justice in environmental cases?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I appreciate the constraints that you feel under in answering some of our questions, as the subject covers more than two portfolios; it is quite a broad area. We heard clearly from our first panel this morning about the need to examine the whole process of justice. In your opening comments, you outlined the three pillars, one of which is about accessing the information.
Is there anything that you can say about what the Scottish Government is doing to look at the three pillars in a holistic way to see where the elements are? Access is your job; some of the other pillars will be down to planning, local government or environment. How is the Government looking at the subject holistically?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have a final quick question. What is your view on the ask for gender equality to be included in one of the national outcomes in order to bring us in line with the sustainable development goals—in particular, SDG 5—and international best practice?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I will elaborate a little bit. We are talking about how we ensure equalities understanding across different Government departments, strategies and ways of working. However, certain data sets are not incorporated into the national outcomes, including data relating to issues such as homelessness and fuel poverty, which, when they go wrong, have fundamental human rights implications. Given the absence of data integration, what do you need in order to be able to meet those outcomes?
There is also an issue about the failure to connect the dots and the need for transparency and understanding, so that people are not making a decision relating to one area that they know will have an effect on another area but are not telling anyone about that.
I am trying to understand the minister’s sense of how we are using the data sets that we have, given the structures of the national outcomes, the NPF, SDGs and all of that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister, and thank you for joining us. I have a couple of questions on some of the bigger-picture stuff that you highlighted when you talked about the embedding of equalities and human rights across the Government’s decision-making. Last week and previously, we heard about some of the disconnect between how we understand the national outcomes and their relationships to national performance framework structures and the sustainable development goals. What work is under way to ensure that we connect those different processes, tools and frameworks? Part of that question is: do we have the data?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I will pick up on one point and explore it a bit further. You talked about some of the ambitions. A lot of hope from across civil society and different sectors was pinned on the human rights legislation. Given that we seem to have lost that galvanising force because the legislation is not being brought forward, how do you see human rights in the NPF? What are the risks for the framework and for actually tackling equalities and human rights injustices?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I come to Catherine Murphy with a similar question. Given policy coherence failures, how well equipped is the NPF to tackle inequalities?