The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1648 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Is it fair to say that, as chief operating officer, you provided leadership of the university’s strategic development and efficient and effective management?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Is it fair to suggest that the directors whom you managed or oversaw should also have been expected to provide leadership with regard to the efficient and effective management of the university and its resources?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I was also going to ask specific questions around procurement breaches. Would you be able to answer them? For example, I have a question on the use of the EAB Global strategic consultancy, and why you went with that, rather than with others. It was a breach of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015, because the project was not put out to tender and just went to EAB Global.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
My final question might be for you all, but I will start with Amanda Millar, as she touched on the issue earlier.
It is very apparent in all of this that there is a lot of upset and hurt on campus. Staff and students are worried, and you have all expressed your sorrow and regret at that. There might be no single point of failure, and no single individual thing that could, and should, have happened differently. However, given that we are where we are with the University of Dundee, what would you say to anybody in the current and future university executive group and court when it comes to asking questions and the things that you wished that you had done two, three, four or 10 years ago?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
As far as you can recall, there was no discussion about the reputational consequences of that at court or in any of the court committees.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Were skills mapping exercises done for court members on more than one occasion, or was that done just at the start of a new academic year? Were such mapping exercises done at all, to your knowledge?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Were you of the view that court members had what they needed to understand the papers that were presented to them when the papers were presented to them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
But, as far as you were aware, there was no specific recognition in the sense of saying, “We need this expertise on court. We don’t currently have it and we don’t have a vacancy, therefore we need to upskill the members who are there.”
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Amanda Millar, is that your recollection?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Given that you cannot recall specific issues being raised around gaps in your understanding or ability to assess risk, how did we get to a position where the risks that we have spent the past four hours talking about were not identified sooner? How were those forecasting issues not turned into risks?
If it is not about the people around the table not having the skills and expertise, and if it is not about not having the knowledge and the facts in front of you, what has gone wrong? We have had on-going conversations about governance restructuring in higher education forever. How can we ensure that we do not find ourselves in the same position, in which forecasts are not turned into risks and are not acted on, risks are not assessed effectively, and the mitigation actions coming from those assessments are not actually developed, never mind followed up?