The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1648 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
I move on to the question of spousal consent and interim GRCs. The bill replicates the current provisions, but what do you think about them? Are you content with them or do they need to change? I will start with Vic Valentine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
You are focusing on the impact on policy making and data.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
I echo Pam Duncan-Glancy’s comments and her thanks to you not only for the work that you have done in presenting written evidence to us prior to today, but for what you have said already and the support that you provide to the people you and your organisations represent.
I would like to explore in a bit more detail three specific areas of the bill: the requirement to live in one’s acquired or inherent gender for three months; the spousal consent and interim GRC issue; and the person with an interest issue.
Dr Crawford, you spoke a bit about the requirement to live in one’s acquired or inherent gender for three months in your opening remarks. We know that there are competing opinions and views about that. Some people think that three months is about right, some think that it is too long and some think that it is too short. It is a reduction from the current two years, obviously. What is your view on the provision on living in an inherent gender for three months prior to getting a GRC? Should we retain it? Colin Macfarlane said a little about the burden of evidence. Is there any risk that a requirement for proof could creep into the three months? I will start with Mhairi Crawford, and then go to Colin Macfarlane and Vic Valentine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Sorry if I misheard.
I appreciate that this may not be possible, but, if you are able and willing, it would be interesting if you could share with us the advice that was sent to the board. That would be really helpful.
Following on from that, I am also interested in what engagement you had with trans people and organisations that support trans people in coming to your changed view on reform.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Vic. Colin, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
I move on to the question of the provision whereby a person with an interest could apply to have a GRC revoked.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Colin. Do you want to respond, Vic?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Do you mean specific changes around the concerns that Melanie Field was talking about, such as the reduction from two years to three months, or do you mean the specific change in the requirement for a gender dysphoria diagnosis and that medicalised approach?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for your comments so far. I want to dig a bit deeper on issues such as master planning and local development plans, which were discussed earlier.
Craig McLaren talked about town centres needing to be places where people want to be. That needs to apply to a range of people: to go back to one of Michelle Thomson’s points, all people need to feel safe. What do you think about the value of local development plans? How important should they be? How do we link the different master planning and visioning exercises? How do we feed those into development plans in a robust way that means that developers cannot override them and things cannot be changed on what often appears to be a whim?
It is crucial in this whole process that we ensure that we are listening to the right people rather than taking a majoritarianism approach, so that we develop places where everyone wants to be, not just the people with loud voices, those who have resources or those who have access to having their voices heard.