Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1648 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Thank you for being with us this morning and for the evidence that you have given us in your opening statement and in writing. Also, thank you for waiting—the first evidence session went on for longer than we had anticipated. I will come to Jen Ang first. In your initial comments, you spoke about your support for the removal of the need for a gender dysphoria diagnosis. Will you say a bit more about why that is so significant and important? Earlier this morning, we heard about the need to retain medical gatekeeping. Will you comment on that? I will come to the other witnesses in a moment.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Naomi, could I come to you on a similar point? Some of the concerns were that with the removal of any medical or psychiatric diagnosis, anybody who wanted a GRC could apply for one. Do you see that as problematic?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

I have a couple of additional questions. Jen Ang and Naomi McAuliffe were talking about capacity, cognitive development and the range of ages at which certain decisions are allowable or enabled. In previous sessions and at some of the informal private sessions that we have had with trans people themselves, we have heard that some people under the age of 10 are clear that there is something that makes them feel that the expression of their identity does not match with the binary world that they are forced to inhabit, and that binary world comes from a clearly patriarchal system. Are there things that we should be considering along the lines of reforming the GRA in the way that the bill does, or more broadly, around supporting people under the age of 16 who might have questions and be thinking about transitioning but do not have the legal right or other support that would enable them to?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

That is fine, thank you.

I have another question. Catherine, can I come back to you? We heard those people who are not supportive of reform of the GRA speak about its widening the group of people who might be eligible to apply for a GRC. We heard that point this morning and we have seen it in evidence elsewhere.

What is your view on the argument that the reform that we are considering would open up the GRC process to a wider group of people? Do you think that we need to think about any safeguarding or mitigation measures as we consider the bill?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Susan Smith, in your opening remarks you spoke about the eligibility criteria more broadly—that is, not only those that are associated with gender dysphoria. Will you say more about the criteria that you consider to be legitimate and not legitimate, and why?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Town Centres and Retail

Meeting date: 25 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Good morning to the panel, and thank you for joining us. I want to explore in a bit more detail some of the issues around community and social development, how they are linked to economic development and how the economic development activities that you are all engaged in can support that.

I will start with Derek Shaw. How are you developing support for commercial enterprises that specifically have a for-good mission as their cornerstone?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Town Centres and Retail

Meeting date: 25 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

It was about commercial enterprises that have a for-good mission at their heart. How are you focusing support, if you are doing so, to enable them to develop and be commercially successful and to provide the social and community benefits that they seek to deliver?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Town Centres and Retail

Meeting date: 25 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Douglas, I know that there is a lot in this, but I come to you for your comments on community wealth building, for-good missions, circularity and resilience—the whole lot.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Town Centres and Retail

Meeting date: 25 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

That is very helpful and a very good example. Craig Iles spoke about landlords working with developers. Is one of the missing pieces direct engagement with communities themselves, who either want to be or are already in town centres, to ensure that there is better understanding of things like the town centre first principle, so that there can be—the policy points that have already been made notwithstanding—delivery on that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Town Centres and Retail

Meeting date: 25 May 2022

Maggie Chapman

Steve Rogers, in one of your earlier answers you talked about the focus of the local development plan having a town centre regeneration development principle at its heart. How can we make sure that that is sustained in decision making, planning and in the visioning that we have talked about?