The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3261 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
ESS received some criticisms last year in the “Report on ERCS’s first 11 representations to Environmental Standards Scotland” by the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland. They include criticisms that you are taking too long following representations to decide whether to investigate and that you are relying exclusively on using informal resolution rather than exercising enforcement powers such as issuing compliance notices. What is your reaction to that criticism?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Would you like that work to go faster? Are you taking into consideration what SEPA went through and the resources that it has?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that resolving issues informally rather than going through compliance is a success story, rather than a criticism.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
One of the examples that the ERCS used was the amount of time that SEPA was given to comply with its legal duties regarding the public register. Will you provide more detail on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I have a question about local authorities. The last time that we had the ESS in, you were supportive of the Scottish Government’s plans to mandate local authorities to report on scope 3 emissions, but you were concerned about the timescales. Has anything changed since the last time you were here to give you some assurance that that can be done?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
If someone raises a case saying that they had made a financial decision and that the rules have changed, so they will now have to spend a lot more money to operate—I do not know how much that would be; it might be nothing or it might be a lot—are you confident that, legally, that would be okay?
10:15Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I want to briefly follow up what the deputy convener said, because I am also concerned that existing plants might have to be retrofitted, which could be expensive and completely change the business case. I am all in favour of having a level playing field, but we have to be careful that we are not moving the goalposts. Is there a case for having a dispensation in place for existing non-waste AD plants and then having regulations in force for any new plants that come on board?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In less than 22 hours’ time, Parliament will have its stage 1 debate on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. Paragraph 3A of rule 9.6 of standing orders states:
“The lead committee shall report to the Parliament in time to allow the report to be published not later than the fifth sitting day before any date allocated in a business programme for the Parliament to consider the general principles of the Bill under paragraph 4.”
The Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee published a report on the bill as introduced on 19 March. Based on my calculations, that does not meet the timescale that is set out in paragraph 3A of rule 9.6.
Furthermore, there has, as yet, been no Government response to the committee’s report. In rule 41 of the protocol on the handling of committee business, in the section entitled “Responses to committee reports”, it is stated:
“The Scottish Government should normally respond to any committee report not later than:
a. two months after publication of the report; or
b. where exceptionally the debate is to be within the 2 months of publication, a week before the Chamber debate the report.”
The committee gave the Government advance sight of its report to try to avoid the situation that we now find ourselves in.
Presiding Officer, I am sure that you will agree that those rules and protocols are in place to ensure that we can have meaningful debate and that members will have had time to read both a committee’s views and the Government’s response. In the light of the fact that rule 9.6 of standing orders has not been met, and of the fact that there has been no response from the Government in line with rule 41 of the protocol on the handling of committee business, can you confirm whether the debate that is scheduled for tomorrow can indeed take place?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
We have heard from the Deputy First Minister that delivering the 800 jobs will require a huge amount of private investment—I think that it is £3.5 billion between now and 2040. What engagement has the Deputy First Minister had with various businesses to gauge the appetite for such huge levels of investment from Petroineos and other companies?